Blount, D.,Minton, G.,Khan, Christin B.,Levenson, Jacob,Dulau, Violaine,Gero, S.,Parham, J.,Holmberg, Jason
Document presented to the Scientific Committee of the International Whaling Commission no. 330, 2020.
Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: Arabian Sea, Artificial intelligence, Flukebook, humpback dolphin, Humpback Whale, Indian Ocean, matching, megaptera novaeangliae, methodology, Oman, photo identification, Sousa chinensis
@techreport{,
title = {Flukebook – Continuing growth and technical advancement for cetacean photo identification and data archiving, including automated fin, fluke, and body matching},
author = {Blount, D.,Minton, G.,Khan, Christin B.,Levenson, Jacob,Dulau, Violaine,Gero, S.,Parham, J.,Holmberg, Jason},
url = {https://arabianseawhalenetwork.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/sc_68b_ph_06_flukebook-developments-incl-aswn-and-indocet-1.pdf},
year = {2020},
date = {2020-01-01},
journal = {Paper presented to the meeting of the Scientific Committee of the International Whaling Commission},
number = {330},
pages = {13},
publisher = {IWC},
institution = {Document presented to the Scientific Committee of the International Whaling Commission},
abstract = {Flukebook (flukebook.org) is a non-profit, open source cetacean data archiving and
photo-identification tool developed under the larger Wildbook platform (wildbook.org) that uses
computer vision and machine learning to facilitate automated identification of individual animals
in the wild. In 2016, the IWC approved funding for the development of a regional data platform
for the Arabian Sea Whale Network (ASWN) to be implemented in collaboration with Wild Me
(wildme.org), the software and machine learning developers of Flukebook. This foundational
collaboration expanded the capabilities of Flukebook and served as the springboard for
subsequent years of growth in data and usage (e.g., by regional consortiums), as well as
significant technical improvements in 2019-2020 in the application of computer vision and
machine learning, specifically for North Atlantic and Southern right whales, humpback whales,
sperm whales, and multiple species of dolphins. Ongoing improvements in our community
support model and technical advances are bringing together industry, governmental, and NGO
collaborators in a global-scale platform for cetacean research.},
keywords = {Arabian Sea, Artificial intelligence, Flukebook, humpback dolphin, Humpback Whale, Indian Ocean, matching, megaptera novaeangliae, methodology, Oman, photo identification, Sousa chinensis},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {techreport}
}
photo-identification tool developed under the larger Wildbook platform (wildbook.org) that uses
computer vision and machine learning to facilitate automated identification of individual animals
in the wild. In 2016, the IWC approved funding for the development of a regional data platform
for the Arabian Sea Whale Network (ASWN) to be implemented in collaboration with Wild Me
(wildme.org), the software and machine learning developers of Flukebook. This foundational
collaboration expanded the capabilities of Flukebook and served as the springboard for
subsequent years of growth in data and usage (e.g., by regional consortiums), as well as
significant technical improvements in 2019-2020 in the application of computer vision and
machine learning, specifically for North Atlantic and Southern right whales, humpback whales,
sperm whales, and multiple species of dolphins. Ongoing improvements in our community
support model and technical advances are bringing together industry, governmental, and NGO
collaborators in a global-scale platform for cetacean research.
Christiansen, F.,Baldwin, R.,Minton, G.,Collins, T.,Sprogis, K. R.,Rudd, J.,al Harthi, S.,Leslie, M.,Macdonald, D. W.,Willson, A.
Assessing the body condition of the world’s only non-migratory humpback whale population, the endangered Arabian Sea humpback whale Technical Report
no. 271, 2020, ISSN: SC_68b_cmp_23_rev1.
Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: Arabian Sea, Body condition, drones, fitness, Humpback Whale, megaptera novaeangliae, Oman, photo identification, photogrammetry, UAV
@techreport{,
title = {Assessing the body condition of the world’s only non-migratory humpback whale population, the endangered Arabian Sea humpback whale},
author = {Christiansen, F.,Baldwin, R.,Minton, G.,Collins, T.,Sprogis, K. R.,Rudd, J.,al Harthi, S.,Leslie, M.,Macdonald, D. W.,Willson, A.},
url = {https://arabianseawhalenetwork.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/sc_68b_cmp_23_rev1_assessment-of-ashw-body-condition-in-oman-1.pdf},
issn = {SC_68b_cmp_23_rev1},
year = {2020},
date = {2020-01-01},
journal = {Paper presented to the meeting of the Scientific Committee of the International Whaling Commission},
number = {271},
pages = {11},
publisher = {IWC},
abstract = {Arabian Sea humpback whales have been a subject of conservation concern in the IWC since 1997. Research conducted primarily off the coast of Oman has contributed to understanding the population’s distribution, abundance, and conservation status, whilst information on the population’s health and specific threats is more limited. This study examines all available images of Arabian Sea humpback whales obtained between 2000 and 2018 for evidence of disease, predation, epizoites and human-induced scarring or injury to individuals. Tattoo-like skin disease was detected in 43.4% of 83 adult whales, with a roughly equal distribution between males and females. The prevalence of the disease was significantly higher in 2012-2018 (51.7%) than in 2000-2011 (24.1%). The lesions persisted for two to 14 years in 10 whales and progressed in prevalence and percentage of body cover in six of them. Killer whale tooth rakes were detected in 12% (95% CI 4.5-18%) of individuals based on examination of photographs showing the ventral surface of tail flukes (n=77), but no cookie cutter shark wounds were detected on any body parts of any of the whales examined. Roughly two thirds (66.6%: 95% CI 52-80%) of individuals represented by good quality photos of the caudal peduncle region (n=42) bore scarring patterns considered likely to be associated with entanglement in fishing gear, with no significant differences in entanglement scarring rates between males and females. Four individuals bore injuries consistent with vessel strikes and at least two individuals showed severe injuries and deformations likely to have been caused by interactions with vessels and/or fishing gear. Five documented entanglement events from Oman and Pakistan involved large-mesh nylon gillnets, which are known to be used extensively throughout the Arabian Sea. In light of this population’s endangered status, these findings indicate an urgent need to continue monitoring Arabian Sea humpback whales, with an emphasis on methods that allow continued and expanded assessment of health, body condition, and anthropogenic interactions, aimed toward designing effective conservation strategies to mitigate known threats. },
keywords = {Arabian Sea, Body condition, drones, fitness, Humpback Whale, megaptera novaeangliae, Oman, photo identification, photogrammetry, UAV},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {techreport}
}
Minton, Gianna,van Bressem, M. F.,Willson, A.,Collins, T.,Al Harthi, S.,Sarrouf Willson, M.,Baldwin, R.,Leslie, M.,Robbins, J.,Van Waerebeek, K
Visual Health Assessment and evaluation of Anthropogenic threats to Arabian Sea Humpback Whales in Oman Technical Report
Document presented to the Scientific Committee of the International Whaling Commission no. 418, 2020.
Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: Arabian Sea, Barnacle, Bycatch, disease, Fisheries, Humpback Whale, killer whale, lesions, megaptera novaeangliae, Oman, pathology, photo identification, predation, scarring, skin, tattoo
@techreport{,
title = {Visual Health Assessment and evaluation of Anthropogenic threats to Arabian Sea Humpback Whales in Oman},
author = {Minton, Gianna,van Bressem, M. F.,Willson, A.,Collins, T.,Al Harthi, S.,Sarrouf Willson, M.,Baldwin, R.,Leslie, M.,Robbins, J.,Van Waerebeek, K},
url = {https://arabianseawhalenetwork.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/sc_68b_cmp_16_rev1_visual-health-assessment-of-ashw-in-oman-1.pdf},
year = {2020},
date = {2020-01-01},
journal = {Paper presented to the meeting of the Scientific Committee of the International Whaling Commission},
number = {418},
pages = {25},
publisher = {IWC},
institution = {Document presented to the Scientific Committee of the International Whaling Commission},
abstract = {Arabian Sea humpback whales have been a subject of conservation concern in the IWC since 1997. Research conducted primarily off the coast of Oman has contributed to understanding the population’s distribution, abundance, and conservation status, whilst information on the population’s health and specific threats is more limited. This study examines all available images of Arabian Sea humpback whales obtained between 2000 and 2018 for evidence of disease, predation, epizoites and human-induced scarring or injury to individuals. Tattoo-like skin disease was detected in 43.4% of 83 adult whales, with a roughly equal distribution between males and females. The prevalence of the disease was significantly higher in 2012-2018 (51.7%) than in 2000-2011 (24.1%). The lesions persisted for two to 14 years in 10 whales and progressed in prevalence and percentage of body cover in six of them. Killer whale tooth rakes were detected in 12% (95% CI 4.5-18%) of individuals based on examination of photographs showing the ventral surface of tail flukes (n=77), but no cookie cutter shark wounds were detected on any body parts of any of the whales examined. Roughly two thirds (66.6%: 95% CI 52-80%) of individuals represented by good quality photos of the caudal peduncle region (n=42) bore scarring patterns considered likely to be associated with entanglement in fishing gear, with no significant differences in entanglement scarring rates between males and females. Four individuals bore injuries consistent with vessel strikes and at least two individuals showed severe injuries and deformations likely to have been caused by interactions with vessels and/or fishing gear. Five documented entanglement events from Oman and Pakistan involved large-mesh nylon gillnets, which are known to be used extensively throughout the Arabian Sea. In light of this population’s endangered status, these findings indicate an urgent need to continue monitoring Arabian Sea humpback whales, with an emphasis on methods that allow continued and expanded assessment of health, body condition, and anthropogenic interactions, aimed toward designing effective conservation strategies to mitigate known threats. },
keywords = {Arabian Sea, Barnacle, Bycatch, disease, Fisheries, Humpback Whale, killer whale, lesions, megaptera novaeangliae, Oman, pathology, photo identification, predation, scarring, skin, tattoo},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {techreport}
}
Moazzam Khan ,Rab Nawaz, Babar Khan, Sudheer Ahmed.
In: Document presented to the meeting of the Scientific Committee of the International Whaling Commission, vol. SC/68B/CMP/08, no. 170, pp. 11, 2020, ISBN: SC/67A/CMP/05.
Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: Arabian Gulf, Arabian Sea, balaenoptera edeni, Bryde's whale, Bycatch, Entanglement, Humpback Whale, megaptera novaeangliae, Observer programmes, Pakistan
@article{,
title = {Whale Distribution in the Northern Arabian Sea along Coast of Pakistan in 2019 based on the information obtained through Fisheries Crew-Based Observer Programme},
author = {Moazzam Khan ,Rab Nawaz, Babar Khan, Sudheer Ahmed. },
url = {https://www.researchgate.net/publication/341776439_Whale_Distribution_in_the_Northern_Arabian_Sea_along_Coast_of_Pakistan_in_2019_based_on_the_information_obtained_through_Fisheries_Crew-Based_Observer_Programme},
isbn = { SC/67A/CMP/05},
year = {2020},
date = {2020-01-01},
urldate = {2020-01-01},
journal = {Document presented to the meeting of the Scientific Committee of the International Whaling Commission},
volume = {SC/68B/CMP/08},
number = {170},
pages = {11},
institution = {Document presented to the Scientific Committee of the International Whaling Commission},
abstract = {In 2012 WWF-Pakistan initiated an observer programme to monitor tuna gillnet operations in the coastal and offshore waters of Pakistan. Among other things, these observers were assigned to report observations of whales encountered during fishing operations. These vessels (with onboard observers) provided a platform of opportunity for recording the spatial and temporal distribution of whales in the Northern Arabian Sea. During 2019 a total of 7 sightings of Arabian Sea humpback whales, 1 sighting each of blue whales and Bryde’s whales, 6 sightings of sperm whales,8 sightings of baleen whales (that could not be identified to species level due to lack of adequate photographic or video evidence) and 3 records of entanglement and mortality of Cuvier’s beaked whales..
Fewer whales were recorded through the programme in 2019 than 2018 and 2017 when a total of 35 and 95 sightings of whale were recorded respectively. This decrease in sightings is attributed to many factors, including early closure of the fishing season in early April 2019 because of low catches and unreliable prices of tuna in the market. As such the fishery was closed for four months from mid-April to mid-August instead of the usual two months of June and July.
Extremely high sea surface temperatures during September to October 2019 (possibly an oceanic heat wave) were believed to be the cause of reduced tuna catches. Therefore, only a few tuna boats remained operational during this period. An unprecedented jellyfish bloom of Crambionella orsini from September 2019 onward forced fishermen to stop fishing operations during this period. Furthermore, the observer programme was completed on September, 2019, after which only 45 out of 75 observers voluntarily continued to provide information about sightings. The paper also reports on two baleen whale strandings - a Bryde’s whale (Balaenoptera brydei) stranded on the rocky shore at Gunz, western coast of Pakistan and a blue whale in Pushukan, Gwadar (West Bay).},
keywords = {Arabian Gulf, Arabian Sea, balaenoptera edeni, Bryde's whale, Bycatch, Entanglement, Humpback Whale, megaptera novaeangliae, Observer programmes, Pakistan},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Fewer whales were recorded through the programme in 2019 than 2018 and 2017 when a total of 35 and 95 sightings of whale were recorded respectively. This decrease in sightings is attributed to many factors, including early closure of the fishing season in early April 2019 because of low catches and unreliable prices of tuna in the market. As such the fishery was closed for four months from mid-April to mid-August instead of the usual two months of June and July.
Extremely high sea surface temperatures during September to October 2019 (possibly an oceanic heat wave) were believed to be the cause of reduced tuna catches. Therefore, only a few tuna boats remained operational during this period. An unprecedented jellyfish bloom of Crambionella orsini from September 2019 onward forced fishermen to stop fishing operations during this period. Furthermore, the observer programme was completed on September, 2019, after which only 45 out of 75 observers voluntarily continued to provide information about sightings. The paper also reports on two baleen whale strandings - a Bryde’s whale (Balaenoptera brydei) stranded on the rocky shore at Gunz, western coast of Pakistan and a blue whale in Pushukan, Gwadar (West Bay).
Moazzam, Mohammed,Nawaz, Rab,Khan, B.,Ahmed, S.
no. 169, 2019.
Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: Arabian Gulf, Arabian Sea, balaenoptera edeni, Bryde's whale, Bycatch, Entanglement, Humpback Whale, megaptera novaeangliae, Observer programmes, Pakistan
@techreport{,
title = {The Distribution of Whales in the Northern Arabian Sea along the Coast of Pakistan Obtained through Crew-Based Observer Programme- Results of the 2018 fishing season},
author = {Moazzam, Mohammed,Nawaz, Rab,Khan, B.,Ahmed, S.},
url = {https://arabianseawhalenetwork.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/sc_68a_cmp_07_whale-sightings-from-pakistan-crew-based-observer-programme-1.pdf},
year = {2019},
date = {2019-01-01},
urldate = {2019-01-01},
journal = {Document presented to the meeting of the Scientific Committee of the International Whaling Commission},
volume = {SC/68A/CMP/07},
number = {169},
pages = {11},
abstract = {Sightings of whales made by WWF-Pakistan’s Crew Based Observers deputed on tuna gillnet vessels operating along Pakistan’s coast were reported for the 2018 fishing season. A total of 13 sightings of Arabian Sea humpback whales, 2 sightings of blue whales, 1 sightings of Bryde’s whales, 4 sightings of sperm whales and 15 sightings of baleen whales (that could not be identified to species level due to lack of adequate photographic or video evidence) were made during 2018. The number of whales recorded for the year 2018 is much less than 2017 when a total of 95 sightings of whale were recorded from the area. This decrease in sighting is attributed to early closure of fishing season in late April 2018 because of extremely low prices of tuna in the market. Usually a voluntary two month close season is observed between June and July, however, the new fishing season was started in September 2018. The close season, therefore, remained effective for about four months (May to August). In addition, a major part of tuna fishing fleet operated in the further offshore waters (known to have thin population of whales) to avoid checking by Government agencies for implementation on various legislation during November- December 2018. },
keywords = {Arabian Gulf, Arabian Sea, balaenoptera edeni, Bryde's whale, Bycatch, Entanglement, Humpback Whale, megaptera novaeangliae, Observer programmes, Pakistan},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {techreport}
}
Sutaria, D.
A Report On Baleen Whale Records And Recent Developments In Marine Mammal Research And Conservation Policy - Update From India Technical Report
no. 240, 2019, ISSN: SC/67A/CMP/03_Rev.
Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: acoustics, Arabian Gulf, Arabian Sea, balaenoptera edeni, balaenoptera musculus, Blue whale, Bryde's whale, Entanglement, Humpback Whale, megaptera novaeangliae, Persian Gulf, ship strike, song, stranding
@techreport{,
title = {A Report On Baleen Whale Records And Recent Developments In Marine Mammal Research And Conservation Policy - Update From India},
author = {Sutaria, D.},
url = {https://arabianseawhalenetwork.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/sc_67a_cmp_03_rev1_baleen-whale-records-from-india-1.pdf},
issn = { SC/67A/CMP/03_Rev},
year = {2019},
date = {2019-01-01},
journal = {Document presented to the meeting of the Scientific Committee of the International Whaling Commission},
number = {240},
pages = {6},
abstract = {Twelve baleen whale reports were collected from June 2018 to May 2019. Of these seven were of live sightings reported by participatory fisher and diver networks along the coast, including two Bryde’s whale groups, and two separate humpback whale sightings of one individual each. The rest were unidentified baleen whale sightings. These reports are summarised here. Five ‘hotspot areas’ of the west coast, were identified, where information was gathered by interviewing fishers and inviting them to be part of a growing participatory reporting network. . We plan to continue this work in 2019-20 with passive acoustic monitoring using SoundTraps in two of the five hotspots. At the National level the Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change, New Delhi has developed a National Arabian Sea Humpback whale Research and Recovery program. National and State-level programs are being developed, with support from the author and a wider research network in India. We recommend dedicated baleen whale surveys and collaborative efforts with local teams, to carry out long term research and conservation, including a net disentanglement workshop. },
keywords = {acoustics, Arabian Gulf, Arabian Sea, balaenoptera edeni, balaenoptera musculus, Blue whale, Bryde's whale, Entanglement, Humpback Whale, megaptera novaeangliae, Persian Gulf, ship strike, song, stranding},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {techreport}
}
Willson, A.,Minton, A. Gianna.,Collins, T. ,Al Harthi, S.,Sarrouf Willson, M.,Cerchio, S,Braulik, G.,Baldwin, R.
Oman Research Update; documenting cetacean diversity and blue whale feeding habitat in Dhofar, southern Oman Technical Report
no. 505, 2019.
Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: acoustic, Arabian Sea, balaenoptera musculus, Blue whale, Distribution, Humpback Whale, megaptera novaeangliae, Oman, photo identification
@techreport{,
title = {Oman Research Update; documenting cetacean diversity and blue whale feeding habitat in Dhofar, southern Oman},
author = {Willson, A.,Minton, A. Gianna.,Collins, T. ,Al Harthi, S.,Sarrouf Willson, M.,Cerchio, S,Braulik, G.,Baldwin, R.},
url = {https://arabianseawhalenetworkdotorg.files.wordpress.com/2019/06/sc_68a_cmp_08_oman-research-update.pdf},
year = {2019},
date = {2019-01-01},
urldate = {2019-01-01},
journal = {Paper presented to the 2019 meeting of the Scientific Committee of the International Whaling Commission},
number = {505},
pages = {14},
publisher = {IWC},
abstract = {Cetacean research has been conducted in Dhofar, southern Oman, since 2000 During this time efforts have been
primarily focused on documenting the distribution, abundance, and ecology of an Endangered population of
Arabian Sea humpback whales (ASHWs). The research has revealed the Hallaniyats Bay (including our study
site measuring approximately 10,000km2
) to be a habitat of importance for reproductive and foraging related
behaviours. Simultaneously the field surveys have revealed high cetacean diversity in the area, with over 18
species documented at the site, out of a total of 22 species known for the Arabian peninsula between 2003 and
2016. Short opportunistic surveys conducted March 2018 to April 2019 continue to provide evidence of the
ecological importance of the area for a diverse array of species, including several species of large baleen whales
(including humpback whales, Bryde’s whales, and blue whales) as well as a range of large, medium and small
odontocetes. Most recently, in April 2019, blue whales were observed over a three-day period, engaged in
behaviour associated with feeding. As well as documenting this important ecological event the team was able to
collect photographic, tissue and faecal samples that are expected to help resolve issues related to taxonomy and
population structure of blue whales in the northern Indian Ocean. The high levels of cetacean diversity and the
regular occurrence of species of scientific and conservation interest documented within a recent Important
Marine Mammal Area workshop suggest that the area warrants conservation management attention to maintain
its current ‘near-wilderness’ state. },
keywords = {acoustic, Arabian Sea, balaenoptera musculus, Blue whale, Distribution, Humpback Whale, megaptera novaeangliae, Oman, photo identification},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {techreport}
}
primarily focused on documenting the distribution, abundance, and ecology of an Endangered population of
Arabian Sea humpback whales (ASHWs). The research has revealed the Hallaniyats Bay (including our study
site measuring approximately 10,000km2
) to be a habitat of importance for reproductive and foraging related
behaviours. Simultaneously the field surveys have revealed high cetacean diversity in the area, with over 18
species documented at the site, out of a total of 22 species known for the Arabian peninsula between 2003 and
2016. Short opportunistic surveys conducted March 2018 to April 2019 continue to provide evidence of the
ecological importance of the area for a diverse array of species, including several species of large baleen whales
(including humpback whales, Bryde’s whales, and blue whales) as well as a range of large, medium and small
odontocetes. Most recently, in April 2019, blue whales were observed over a three-day period, engaged in
behaviour associated with feeding. As well as documenting this important ecological event the team was able to
collect photographic, tissue and faecal samples that are expected to help resolve issues related to taxonomy and
population structure of blue whales in the northern Indian Ocean. The high levels of cetacean diversity and the
regular occurrence of species of scientific and conservation interest documented within a recent Important
Marine Mammal Area workshop suggest that the area warrants conservation management attention to maintain
its current ‘near-wilderness’ state.
Cerchio, S.,Willson, A.,Muirhead, C.,Al Harthi, S.,Baldwin, R.,Bonato, M,Collins, T.,Di Clemente, J.,Dulau, Violaine,Estrade, Vanessa,Latha, G,Minton, A. Gianna.,Sarrouf Willson, M.
Geographic variation in song indicates both isolation of Arabian Sea humpback whales and presence of Southern Hemisphere whales off Oman Technical Report
no. 342, 2018, ISSN: IWC/SC67B/CMP19.
Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: Humpback Whale, India, Indian Ocean, megaptera novaeangliae, Oman, population structure, Reunion, song
@techreport{,
title = {Geographic variation in song indicates both isolation of Arabian Sea humpback whales and presence of Southern Hemisphere whales off Oman},
author = {Cerchio, S.,Willson, A.,Muirhead, C.,Al Harthi, S.,Baldwin, R.,Bonato, M,Collins, T.,Di Clemente, J.,Dulau, Violaine,Estrade, Vanessa,Latha, G,Minton, A. Gianna.,Sarrouf Willson, M.},
url = {https://arabianseawhalenetwork.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/sc_67b_cmp_19_oman-humpback-whale-song-analysis-and-comparison-1.pdf},
issn = {IWC/SC67B/CMP19},
year = {2018},
date = {2018-01-01},
journal = {Document presented to the Scientific Committee of the International Whaling Commission},
number = {342},
pages = {31},
publisher = {International Whaling Commission},
abstract = {Existing genetic, demographic and behavioral evidence indicates that Arabian Sea humpback whales
represent an isolated and unique population. The population exhibits a Northern Hemisphere breeding
cycle, is believed to feed year-round, and lacks the typical latitudinal migrations and seasonal separation
of breeding and feeding ecology exhibited by other populations of humpback whales globally. A key
feature of humpback whale breeding behavior is the male acoustic breeding display, song, studied
extensively around the world. Key characteristics of humpback whale song include: all males within a
population share the same song patterns (phrases); a population’s song changes progressively over time;
and populations that do not overlap or exchange individuals have distinctly different songs, whereas
populations in contact share some or all phrases. Here we use long-term acoustic monitoring off the coast
of Oman to further assess the isolation of the Arabian Sea population. A total of 76 samples (amounting
to 4,434 minutes of recording) of Arabian Sea song collected between 2011 and 2013 were examined, and
phrase content was characterized and compared to 23 samples (totaling 202 min of recording) collected
during the same years in the Southwest Indian Ocean from Reunion Island and the Comoros Islands. Song
from the Arabian Sea and the Southwest Indian Ocean was distinct across the entire study period, with no
evidence for shared phrases in any year. In addition, song fragments recorded off western India in 2011
were composed of two phrases present in the Oman song, suggesting continuity across the Arabian Sea.
Moreover, the Arabian Sea song exhibited a markedly atypical low level of temporal variation, with song
phrases remaining virtually unchanged during the three examined breeding seasons. Notably, Southwest
Indian Ocean song was recorded off the coast of Oman in August 2012 (Boreal summer, Austral winter).
This song was recorded on multiple days and included multiple simultaneous singers over a 25 day period
indicating the presence of more than a single accidental vagrant Southern Hemisphere animal. We suggest
that these Southern songs were produced by Southwest Indian Ocean animals moving into the Arabian
Sea, and that this may be more common than is currently thought. The low level of temporal variation
shown by the Arabian Sea males along with the lack of adoption of the Southwest Indian Ocean song
material, further indicate the uniqueness and distinct nature of this population. It seems possible that
isolation mechanisms exist that may inhibit the mixing of the Arabian Sea population with Southern
Hemisphere animals, and that this may be reflected in the observed atypical song behavior.},
keywords = {Humpback Whale, India, Indian Ocean, megaptera novaeangliae, Oman, population structure, Reunion, song},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {techreport}
}
represent an isolated and unique population. The population exhibits a Northern Hemisphere breeding
cycle, is believed to feed year-round, and lacks the typical latitudinal migrations and seasonal separation
of breeding and feeding ecology exhibited by other populations of humpback whales globally. A key
feature of humpback whale breeding behavior is the male acoustic breeding display, song, studied
extensively around the world. Key characteristics of humpback whale song include: all males within a
population share the same song patterns (phrases); a population’s song changes progressively over time;
and populations that do not overlap or exchange individuals have distinctly different songs, whereas
populations in contact share some or all phrases. Here we use long-term acoustic monitoring off the coast
of Oman to further assess the isolation of the Arabian Sea population. A total of 76 samples (amounting
to 4,434 minutes of recording) of Arabian Sea song collected between 2011 and 2013 were examined, and
phrase content was characterized and compared to 23 samples (totaling 202 min of recording) collected
during the same years in the Southwest Indian Ocean from Reunion Island and the Comoros Islands. Song
from the Arabian Sea and the Southwest Indian Ocean was distinct across the entire study period, with no
evidence for shared phrases in any year. In addition, song fragments recorded off western India in 2011
were composed of two phrases present in the Oman song, suggesting continuity across the Arabian Sea.
Moreover, the Arabian Sea song exhibited a markedly atypical low level of temporal variation, with song
phrases remaining virtually unchanged during the three examined breeding seasons. Notably, Southwest
Indian Ocean song was recorded off the coast of Oman in August 2012 (Boreal summer, Austral winter).
This song was recorded on multiple days and included multiple simultaneous singers over a 25 day period
indicating the presence of more than a single accidental vagrant Southern Hemisphere animal. We suggest
that these Southern songs were produced by Southwest Indian Ocean animals moving into the Arabian
Sea, and that this may be more common than is currently thought. The low level of temporal variation
shown by the Arabian Sea males along with the lack of adoption of the Southwest Indian Ocean song
material, further indicate the uniqueness and distinct nature of this population. It seems possible that
isolation mechanisms exist that may inhibit the mixing of the Arabian Sea population with Southern
Hemisphere animals, and that this may be reflected in the observed atypical song behavior.
Madhusudhana, Shyam Kumar,Chakraborty, Bishwajit,Latha, G.
Humpback whale singing activity off the Goan coast in the Eastern Arabian Sea Journal Article
In: Bioacoustics, no. 147, pp. 1-16, 2018, ISBN: 0952-4622.
Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: Arabian Sea, breeding, Goa, Humpback Whale, India, Megaptera novaeanglia, PAM, passive acoustic monitoring, song, vocal behaviour
@article{,
title = {Humpback whale singing activity off the Goan coast in the Eastern Arabian Sea},
author = {Madhusudhana, Shyam Kumar,Chakraborty, Bishwajit,Latha, G.},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1080/09524622.2018.1458248},
issn = {0952-4622},
year = {2018},
date = {2018-01-01},
journal = {Bioacoustics},
number = {147},
pages = {1-16},
publisher = {Taylor & Francis},
abstract = {AbstractFor over two decades, passive acoustic monitoring (PAM) methods have been successfully employed around the world for studying aquatic megafauna. PAM-driven studies in Indian waters have so far been relatively very scarce. Furthermore, cetacean populations inhabiting the north western Indian Ocean are far less studied than those in many other regions around the world. This work likely constitutes the first systematic study of the vocal repertoire of humpback whales (Megaptera novaeangliae) at a near-shore site along the western coast of India. Analysis of the observed vocalizations provides an insight into the behaviour of the species. This is significant as it assists in developing a better understanding of the habitat use of the non-migratory Arabian Sea humpback whale population. In contrast, other breeding populations such as those around the North Atlantic, South Pacific and Australia have been relatively well studied. Underwater passive acoustic data were collected during March 2017 using an autonomous logger at a shallow-water site off the eastern edge of Grande Island off the coast of Goa. Humpback whale vocalizations were found to occur over multiple days in the recordings. Time?frequency contours of individual units of vocalization were extracted with the aid of an automatic detection technique and the characteristics of the units were measured. Further, successive units were analysed for formation of phrases and themes. Reconstruction of putative songs from the identified units and themes was not possible due to the limitations imposed by the nature of data collection. Detailed analyses of units, phrases and themes are presented.},
keywords = {Arabian Sea, breeding, Goa, Humpback Whale, India, Megaptera novaeanglia, PAM, passive acoustic monitoring, song, vocal behaviour},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Sutaria, D.
Baleen whale reports from the eastern Arabian Sea based on interview surveys and stranding reports - update from India Technical Report
no. 483, 2018, ISSN: SC/67B/CMP/15.
Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: acoustics, Arabian Gulf, Arabian Sea, balaenoptera edeni, balaenoptera musculus, Blue whale, Bryde's whale, Entanglement, Humpback Whale, megaptera novaeangliae, Persian Gulf, ship strike, song, stranding
@techreport{,
title = {Baleen whale reports from the eastern Arabian Sea based on interview surveys and stranding reports - update from India},
author = {Sutaria, D.},
url = {https://arabianseawhalenetwork.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/sc_67b_cmp_15_baleen-whale-records-from-india-1.pdf},
issn = { SC/67B/CMP/15},
year = {2018},
date = {2018-01-01},
journal = {Document presented to the meeting of the Scientific Committee of the International Whaling Commission},
number = {483},
pages = {16},
abstract = {In 2017-18, seven unidentified baleen whales, two Bryde’s whales (Balaenoptera edeni) and two
humpback whales (Megaptera novaeangliae) have been reported from the west coast of India (eastern
Arabian Sea). The stranding and sighting reports are summarised here. Fishers were interviewed from
south Gujarat to west Tamil Nadu, for baleen whale sighting events to identify hotspots, and to collect
community perceptions towards baleen whales. Based on these interviews, along with data on
strandings, opportunistic song recordings, and the recent presence of a satellite tagged whale from
Oman, seven regions have been identified as hotspots and habitats used by humpback whales.
Humpback whales in these areas seem to be common during the months of January to March. We
continue our work in 2018-20 with systematic vessel based surveys using dipping hydrophones in four
of the seven hotspots. We recommend dedicated baleen whale surveys and collaborative efforts with
local and international teams, to carry out in-depth analyses of stranding events, and for a larger
coverage in visual surveys with the future use of static passive acoustic monitoring systems.},
keywords = {acoustics, Arabian Gulf, Arabian Sea, balaenoptera edeni, balaenoptera musculus, Blue whale, Bryde's whale, Entanglement, Humpback Whale, megaptera novaeangliae, Persian Gulf, ship strike, song, stranding},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {techreport}
}
humpback whales (Megaptera novaeangliae) have been reported from the west coast of India (eastern
Arabian Sea). The stranding and sighting reports are summarised here. Fishers were interviewed from
south Gujarat to west Tamil Nadu, for baleen whale sighting events to identify hotspots, and to collect
community perceptions towards baleen whales. Based on these interviews, along with data on
strandings, opportunistic song recordings, and the recent presence of a satellite tagged whale from
Oman, seven regions have been identified as hotspots and habitats used by humpback whales.
Humpback whales in these areas seem to be common during the months of January to March. We
continue our work in 2018-20 with systematic vessel based surveys using dipping hydrophones in four
of the seven hotspots. We recommend dedicated baleen whale surveys and collaborative efforts with
local and international teams, to carry out in-depth analyses of stranding events, and for a larger
coverage in visual surveys with the future use of static passive acoustic monitoring systems.
Willson, A.,Leslie, M.,Baldwin, R.,Cerchio, S.,Childerhouse, S.,Collins, T.,Findlay, K.,Genov, T.,Godley, B. J.,Al Harthi, S.,Macdonald, D. W.,Minton, G.,Zerbini, A.,Witt, M.J.
In: Document presented to the Scientific Committee of the International Whaling Commission, no. 504, pp. 15, 2018, ISSN: IWC/SC67B/CMP13Rev1.
Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: health, Humpback Whale, lesions, megaptera novaeangliae, Oman, photo-identification, Satellite telemetry, song, tattoo, UAV
@article{,
title = {Update on satellite telemetry studies and first unoccupied aerial vehicle assisted health assessment studies of Arabian Sea humpback whales off the coast of Oman.},
author = {Willson, A.,Leslie, M.,Baldwin, R.,Cerchio, S.,Childerhouse, S.,Collins, T.,Findlay, K.,Genov, T.,Godley, B. J.,Al Harthi, S.,Macdonald, D. W.,Minton, G.,Zerbini, A.,Witt, M.J.},
url = {https://arabianseawhalenetwork.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/sc_67b_cmp_13_rev1_oman-humbpack-whale-research-update-1.pdf},
issn = {IWC/SC67B/CMP13Rev1},
year = {2018},
date = {2018-01-01},
urldate = {2018-01-01},
journal = {Document presented to the Scientific Committee of the International Whaling Commission},
number = {504},
pages = {15},
publisher = {International Whaling Commission},
abstract = {Four previously documented surveys focusing on satellite tagging Arabian Sea humpback whales (ASHW) have
taken place off the coast of Oman since 2014. We present information of the most recent multidisciplinary survey
from November 2017 including results of telemetry studies to investigate spatial ecology, photo-identification
work to support population estimates and the trial of new methods using Unoccupied Aerial Vehicles (UAV’s) in
conducting non-invasive health assessments. The findings document the first record of the transoceanic passage
of an ASHW within the Arabian Sea and preliminary evidence of regional scale connectivity. Small vessel surveys
resulted in 45 hours of effort resulting in a total of 35 sightings and encounters with over 18 identified individual
ASHWs. Five tags were successfully deployed, three being attached to whales already identified in the ASHW
catalogue (one female and two males) and two whales new to the catalogue (of as yet unknown sex). The recent
telemetry work brings the project total to 14 deployed tags. Four whales from the recent tagged group occupied
regions previously described as important habitat in the South of Oman including the Gulf of Masirah and
Hallaniyats Bay. The tag with the longest tracking duration (n=120 days) documented the passage of an adult
female from the Gulf of Masirah across to the west coast of India, south towards to the Gulf of Manar off the
southern tip of India and the subsequent return of the whale to the tagging site. Additionally, a hexacopter UAV
(drone) was used to acquire digital images of 7 whales to inform investigations into body condition (length-width
relationship), tissue scaring and skin disease. UAVs that were flown through respired condensate (blow) resulted
in collection of three viable samples collected for micro-biome assessment of the respiratory tract. On a broad
geographic scale the tracking data continues to confirm the importance of waters over the continental shelf in
southern Oman for ASHW and together with passive acoustic monitoring studies provides new evidence to
support previous understanding on the connectivity between humpback whales of the Arabian Sea. The frequency
of sightings in the study area, and documented breeding related behaviour during the survey supports existing
evidence demonstrating that the Gulf of Masirah is a critical habitat for the ASHW. Effective conservation of this
population requires concerted application of threat mitigation, whilst studies continue to support the on-going
conservation management requirement to understand the broader spatial ecology of the population.},
keywords = {health, Humpback Whale, lesions, megaptera novaeangliae, Oman, photo-identification, Satellite telemetry, song, tattoo, UAV},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
taken place off the coast of Oman since 2014. We present information of the most recent multidisciplinary survey
from November 2017 including results of telemetry studies to investigate spatial ecology, photo-identification
work to support population estimates and the trial of new methods using Unoccupied Aerial Vehicles (UAV’s) in
conducting non-invasive health assessments. The findings document the first record of the transoceanic passage
of an ASHW within the Arabian Sea and preliminary evidence of regional scale connectivity. Small vessel surveys
resulted in 45 hours of effort resulting in a total of 35 sightings and encounters with over 18 identified individual
ASHWs. Five tags were successfully deployed, three being attached to whales already identified in the ASHW
catalogue (one female and two males) and two whales new to the catalogue (of as yet unknown sex). The recent
telemetry work brings the project total to 14 deployed tags. Four whales from the recent tagged group occupied
regions previously described as important habitat in the South of Oman including the Gulf of Masirah and
Hallaniyats Bay. The tag with the longest tracking duration (n=120 days) documented the passage of an adult
female from the Gulf of Masirah across to the west coast of India, south towards to the Gulf of Manar off the
southern tip of India and the subsequent return of the whale to the tagging site. Additionally, a hexacopter UAV
(drone) was used to acquire digital images of 7 whales to inform investigations into body condition (length-width
relationship), tissue scaring and skin disease. UAVs that were flown through respired condensate (blow) resulted
in collection of three viable samples collected for micro-biome assessment of the respiratory tract. On a broad
geographic scale the tracking data continues to confirm the importance of waters over the continental shelf in
southern Oman for ASHW and together with passive acoustic monitoring studies provides new evidence to
support previous understanding on the connectivity between humpback whales of the Arabian Sea. The frequency
of sightings in the study area, and documented breeding related behaviour during the survey supports existing
evidence demonstrating that the Gulf of Masirah is a critical habitat for the ASHW. Effective conservation of this
population requires concerted application of threat mitigation, whilst studies continue to support the on-going
conservation management requirement to understand the broader spatial ecology of the population.
Baldwin, R.,Willson, A.,Al Baluchi, A.,Al Jabri, A.
Planning for responsible humpback whale watching in Oman Technical Report
no. 311, 2017, ISBN: SC/67A/WW/03.
Abstract | BibTeX | Tags: Arabian Gulf, Arabian Sea, disturbance, Humpback Whale, megaptera novaeangliae, Threat assessment, tourism, Whale watching
@techreport{,
title = {Planning for responsible humpback whale watching in Oman},
author = {Baldwin, R.,Willson, A.,Al Baluchi, A.,Al Jabri, A.},
issn = { SC/67A/WW/03},
year = {2017},
date = {2017-01-01},
journal = {Document presented to the meeting of the Scientific Committee of the International Whaling Commission},
number = {311},
pages = {17},
abstract = {The emerging whale watching industry in Oman includes one small-scale tour operator targeting
Endangered Arabian Sea humpback whales, as well as other operators that opportunistically encounter this
species. Guidelines for whale watching in Oman were developed in 2013/14 as part of an IWC-supported
project that also included awareness-raising and initial training of tour operators and vessel captains in key
locations. This formed the basis of the current study which aims to identify requirements to minimise the
potentially negative impacts of whale watching on Arabian Sea humpback whales specifically, whilst also
highlighting some key business approaches for achieving responsibly-managed whale watching in Oman.
The whale watching industry in Oman has potential for growth and should be appropriately guided in
advance of expansion. A road map of actions towards this goal is outlined, aimed at government and
private sector stakeholders. Recommendations are also made for monitoring and controlling whale
watching activities pending further research. Further training of operators (especially vessel captains) is
still required to ensure responsible boat handling around whales and improved planning towards a more
sustainable industry. The use of whale watching vessel as a platform for collection of scientific data has
been initiated at one location. Draft regulations to help govern the industry in Oman have been prepared
and are under review by Oman’s Ministry of Environment and Climate Affairs. Although focused on
humpback whales, the study also recommends that results are applied to other species and identifies
priorities for data collection to fill existing knowledge gaps.},
keywords = {Arabian Gulf, Arabian Sea, disturbance, Humpback Whale, megaptera novaeangliae, Threat assessment, tourism, Whale watching},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {techreport}
}
Endangered Arabian Sea humpback whales, as well as other operators that opportunistically encounter this
species. Guidelines for whale watching in Oman were developed in 2013/14 as part of an IWC-supported
project that also included awareness-raising and initial training of tour operators and vessel captains in key
locations. This formed the basis of the current study which aims to identify requirements to minimise the
potentially negative impacts of whale watching on Arabian Sea humpback whales specifically, whilst also
highlighting some key business approaches for achieving responsibly-managed whale watching in Oman.
The whale watching industry in Oman has potential for growth and should be appropriately guided in
advance of expansion. A road map of actions towards this goal is outlined, aimed at government and
private sector stakeholders. Recommendations are also made for monitoring and controlling whale
watching activities pending further research. Further training of operators (especially vessel captains) is
still required to ensure responsible boat handling around whales and improved planning towards a more
sustainable industry. The use of whale watching vessel as a platform for collection of scientific data has
been initiated at one location. Draft regulations to help govern the industry in Oman have been prepared
and are under review by Oman’s Ministry of Environment and Climate Affairs. Although focused on
humpback whales, the study also recommends that results are applied to other species and identifies
priorities for data collection to fill existing knowledge gaps.
Dakhteh, Seyed M. H.,Ranjbar, Sharif,Moazeni, Mostafa,Mohsenian, Nazanin,Delshab, Hossein,Moshiri, Hamed,Nabavi, Seyed M. B.,Van Waerebeek, Koen
The Persian Gulf is part of the habitual range of the Arabian Sea Humpback whale population Journal Article
In: Journal of Marine Biology & Oceanography, vol. 6, no. 77, pp. 1-6, 2017.
Abstract | BibTeX | Tags: Arabian Gulf, Arabian Sea, Distribution, Humpback Whale, megaptera novaeangliae, Persian Gulf, ship strike
@article{,
title = {The Persian Gulf is part of the habitual range of the Arabian Sea Humpback whale population},
author = {Dakhteh, Seyed M. H.,Ranjbar, Sharif,Moazeni, Mostafa,Mohsenian, Nazanin,Delshab, Hossein,Moshiri, Hamed,Nabavi, Seyed M. B.,Van Waerebeek, Koen},
year = {2017},
date = {2017-01-01},
journal = {Journal of Marine Biology & Oceanography},
volume = {6},
number = {77},
pages = {1-6},
abstract = {The humpback whale has long been considered a rare straggler into the Persian Gulf, however new evidence contradicts this concept. We here critically review published and new records for Megaptera novaeangliae occurrence in the Gulf for the period 1883-2017. Of eight authenticated records (6 specimens, 2 live-sightings), seven are contemporary cases while one is a mid-Holocene specimen from UAE. An additional four are possible but unsubstantiated reports. Four regional, current, range states are confirmed, i.e. Iran, Iraq, Kuwait and Qatar. Four of the five newly reported cases are from Iran's coastal waters. We conclude that the Persian Gulf is part of the habitual range of the Arabian Sea humpback whale population, and has been since at least the mid-Holocene. It is unknown whether frequent passage occurs through the Strait of Hormuz or whether whales are (semi)resident. The low abundance of this endangered population and frequent deleterious anthropogenic events, particularly ship strikes and net entanglements, are cause for major concern. In view of its historical and taxonomic relevance, the formal description of Megaptera indica Gervais, 1883, from Iraq, now thought to be a subspecies M. novaeangliae indica, is here translated from French.%U http://www.biorxiv.org/content/biorxiv/early/2017/09/06/185033.full.pdf},
keywords = {Arabian Gulf, Arabian Sea, Distribution, Humpback Whale, megaptera novaeangliae, Persian Gulf, ship strike},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Dakteh, S.M.H.,Ranjbar, S.,Moazeni, M.,Mohsenian, Nazanin,Delshab, H.,Moshiri, H.,Van Waerebeek, K
On the presence of humpback whales in the Persian Gulf: rare or rarely documented? Technical Report
no. 78, 2017, ISBN: SC/67A/CMP/14.
Abstract | BibTeX | Tags: Arabian Gulf, Arabian Sea, Entanglement, Humpback Whale, megaptera novaeangliae, Persian Gulf, ship strike, stranding
@techreport{,
title = {On the presence of humpback whales in the Persian Gulf: rare or rarely documented?},
author = {Dakteh, S.M.H.,Ranjbar, S.,Moazeni, M.,Mohsenian, Nazanin,Delshab, H.,Moshiri, H.,Van Waerebeek, K},
issn = { SC/67A/CMP/14},
year = {2017},
date = {2017-01-01},
journal = {Document presented to the meeting of the Scientific Committee of the International Whaling Commission},
number = {78},
pages = {7},
abstract = {We critically review the evidence for humpback whale presence in the Persian Gulf. Five specimen records, assumed to belong to the
endangered Arabian Sea population, are confirmed in the period 1883- 2017: Bassore Bay, Iraq; Doha, Qatar; Kuwait Inner harbour,
Kuwait; Qeshm Island, Iran; and Akhtar, Bushehr Province, Iran. The two Iranian cases, both juveniles, are newly recorded. With
accumulating reports, an alternate hypothesis to 'rare stragglers' deserves consideration, one in which Arabian Sea humpback whales
may enter the Persian Gulf with some regularity, perhaps as normal visitors, if not permanent residents. Deficiency of records may
reflect a general sparsity of whale research effort in the Persian Gulf. The historical description of Megaptera indica Gervais, 1883 is
translated from French.},
keywords = {Arabian Gulf, Arabian Sea, Entanglement, Humpback Whale, megaptera novaeangliae, Persian Gulf, ship strike, stranding},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {techreport}
}
endangered Arabian Sea population, are confirmed in the period 1883- 2017: Bassore Bay, Iraq; Doha, Qatar; Kuwait Inner harbour,
Kuwait; Qeshm Island, Iran; and Akhtar, Bushehr Province, Iran. The two Iranian cases, both juveniles, are newly recorded. With
accumulating reports, an alternate hypothesis to 'rare stragglers' deserves consideration, one in which Arabian Sea humpback whales
may enter the Persian Gulf with some regularity, perhaps as normal visitors, if not permanent residents. Deficiency of records may
reflect a general sparsity of whale research effort in the Persian Gulf. The historical description of Megaptera indica Gervais, 1883 is
translated from French.
Kershaw, Francine,Carvalho, Inês,Loo, Jacqueline,Pomilla, Cristina,Best, Peter B.,Findlay, Ken P.,Cerchio, Salvatore,Collins, Tim,Engel, Marcia H.,Minton, Gianna,Ersts, Peter,Barendse, Jaco,Kotze, P. G. H.,Razafindrakoto, Yvette,Ngouessono, Solange,Meÿer, Michael,Thorton, Meredith,Rosenbaum, Howard C.
Multiple processes drive genetic structure of humpback whale ( Journal Article
In: Molecular Ecology, no. 131, pp. n/a-n/a, 2017, ISBN: 1365-294X.
Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: behaviour, Humpback Whale, International Whaling Commission, megaptera novaeangliae, population assessment, population genetics, population identity, population structure, Southern Hemisphere, wildlife management
@article{,
title = {Multiple processes drive genetic structure of humpback whale (},
author = {Kershaw, Francine,Carvalho, Inês,Loo, Jacqueline,Pomilla, Cristina,Best, Peter B.,Findlay, Ken P.,Cerchio, Salvatore,Collins, Tim,Engel, Marcia H.,Minton, Gianna,Ersts, Peter,Barendse, Jaco,Kotze, P. G. H.,Razafindrakoto, Yvette,Ngouessono, Solange,Meÿer, Michael,Thorton, Meredith,Rosenbaum, Howard C.},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/mec.13943},
issn = {1365-294X},
year = {2017},
date = {2017-01-01},
journal = {Molecular Ecology},
number = {131},
pages = {n/a-n/a},
abstract = {Elucidating patterns of population structure for species with complex life histories, and disentangling the processes driving such patterns, remains a significant analytical challenge. Humpback whale (Megaptera novaeangliae) populations display complex genetic structures that have not been fully resolved at all spatial scales. We generated a data set of nuclear markers for 3575 samples spanning the seven breeding stocks and substocks found in the South Atlantic and western and northern Indian Oceans. For the total sample, and males and females separately, we assessed genetic diversity, tested for genetic differentiation between putative populations and isolation by distance, estimated the number of genetic clusters without a priori population information and estimated rates of gene flow using maximum-likelihood and Bayesian approaches. At the ocean basin scale, structure is governed by geographical distance (IBD P < 0.05) and female fidelity to breeding areas, in line with current understanding of the drivers of broadscale population structure. Consistent with previous studies, the Arabian Sea breeding stock was highly genetically differentiated (FST 0.034–0.161; P < 0.01 for all comparisons). However, the breeding stock boundary between west South Africa and east Africa was more porous than expected based on genetic differentiation, cluster and geneflow analyses. Instances of male fidelity to breeding areas and relatively high rates of dispersal for females were also observed between the three substocks in the western Indian Ocean. The relationships between demographic units and current management boundaries may have ramifications for assessments of the status and continued protections of populations still in recovery from commercial whaling.},
keywords = {behaviour, Humpback Whale, International Whaling Commission, megaptera novaeangliae, population assessment, population genetics, population identity, population structure, Southern Hemisphere, wildlife management},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Moazzam, Mohammed,Nawaz, Rab
Arabian Humpback and Baleen Whale sightings along the Pakistan Coast: Information Generated Through WWF Pakistan’s Fishing Crew Observer Programme Technical Report
no. 168, 2017, ISBN: SC/67A/CMP/05.
Abstract | BibTeX | Tags: Arabian Gulf, Arabian Sea, balaenoptera edeni, Bryde's whale, Bycatch, Entanglement, Humpback Whale, megaptera novaeangliae, Observer programmes, Pakistan
@techreport{,
title = {Arabian Humpback and Baleen Whale sightings along the Pakistan Coast: Information Generated Through WWF Pakistan’s Fishing Crew Observer Programme},
author = {Moazzam, Mohammed,Nawaz, Rab},
issn = { SC/67A/CMP/05},
year = {2017},
date = {2017-01-01},
journal = {Document presented to the meeting of the Scientific Committee of the International Whaling Commission},
number = {168},
pages = {16},
abstract = {Historical records and Soviet whaling data indicate the presence of baleen whales off the coast of
Pakistan up to 1965, but since then only a handful of strandings and opportunistic sightings
confirm their ongoing presence in the region. Between 2012 and 2016, observations of freeswimming
and entangled whales were recorded by fishing vessel crew members trained under a
bycatch observer scheme coordinated by WWF Pakistan. The scheme, which started with two
observers in 2012, now involves 75 participating vessels. Reported baleen whale observations
increased from none in 2012, to 16 in 2015. In 2016, 47 sightings of baleen whales were
recorded, including 12 confirmed sightings of Arabian Sea humpback whales, three sightings of
Bryde’s and 32 sightings of baleen whales that could not be identified to species level due to lack
of adequate photographic or video evidence. Sightings reported from 2012 through 2016 are
summarized and plotted, providing insight into the current distribution of Arabian Sea humpback
whales and other baleen whale species in the region. The authors recommend the continuation of
the programme, and suggest that it could serve as a useful model for crew-based reporting
schemes in a region where dedicated cetacean surveys are difficult to conduct, but fisheries are
widespread and active.},
keywords = {Arabian Gulf, Arabian Sea, balaenoptera edeni, Bryde's whale, Bycatch, Entanglement, Humpback Whale, megaptera novaeangliae, Observer programmes, Pakistan},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {techreport}
}
Pakistan up to 1965, but since then only a handful of strandings and opportunistic sightings
confirm their ongoing presence in the region. Between 2012 and 2016, observations of freeswimming
and entangled whales were recorded by fishing vessel crew members trained under a
bycatch observer scheme coordinated by WWF Pakistan. The scheme, which started with two
observers in 2012, now involves 75 participating vessels. Reported baleen whale observations
increased from none in 2012, to 16 in 2015. In 2016, 47 sightings of baleen whales were
recorded, including 12 confirmed sightings of Arabian Sea humpback whales, three sightings of
Bryde’s and 32 sightings of baleen whales that could not be identified to species level due to lack
of adequate photographic or video evidence. Sightings reported from 2012 through 2016 are
summarized and plotted, providing insight into the current distribution of Arabian Sea humpback
whales and other baleen whale species in the region. The authors recommend the continuation of
the programme, and suggest that it could serve as a useful model for crew-based reporting
schemes in a region where dedicated cetacean surveys are difficult to conduct, but fisheries are
widespread and active.
Rosenbaum, H. C.,Kershaw, F.,Mendez, M.,Pomilla, C.,Leslie, M. S.,Findlay, K. P.,Best, P. B.,Collins, T.,Vely, M.,Engel, M. H.,Baldwin, R.,Minton, G.,Meÿer, M.,Flórez-González, L.,Poole, M. M.,Hauser, N.,Garrigue, C.,Brasseur, M.,Bannister, J.,Anderson, M.,Olavarría, C.,Baker, C. S.
First circumglobal assessment of Southern Hemisphere humpback whale mitochondrial genetic variation and implications for management Journal Article
In: Endangered Species Research, vol. 32, no. 213, pp. 551-567, 2017.
Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: Arabian Sea, breeding grounds, Genetic differentiation, Humpback Whale, megaptera novaeangliae, mtDNA, population structure, Stock assessment
@article{,
title = {First circumglobal assessment of Southern Hemisphere humpback whale mitochondrial genetic variation and implications for management},
author = {Rosenbaum, H. C.,Kershaw, F.,Mendez, M.,Pomilla, C.,Leslie, M. S.,Findlay, K. P.,Best, P. B.,Collins, T.,Vely, M.,Engel, M. H.,Baldwin, R.,Minton, G.,Meÿer, M.,Flórez-González, L.,Poole, M. M.,Hauser, N.,Garrigue, C.,Brasseur, M.,Bannister, J.,Anderson, M.,Olavarría, C.,Baker, C. S.},
url = {http://www.int-res.com/abstracts/esr/v32/p551-567/},
year = {2017},
date = {2017-01-01},
journal = {Endangered Species Research},
volume = {32},
number = {213},
pages = {551-567},
abstract = {ABSTRACT: The description of genetic population structure over a species geographic range can provide insights into its evolutionary history and also support effective management efforts. Assessments for globally distributed species are rare, however, requiring significant international coordination and collaboration. The global distribution of demographically discrete populations for the humpback whale \textit{Megaptera novaeangliae} is not fully known, hampering the definition of appropriate management units. Here, we present the first circumglobal assessment of mitochondrial genetic population structure across the species range in the Southern Hemisphere and Arabian Sea. We combine new and existing data from the mitochondrial (mt)DNA control region that resulted in a 311 bp consensus sequence of the mtDNA control region for 3009 individuals sampled across 14 breeding stocks and subpopulations currently recognized by the International Whaling Commission. We assess genetic diversity and test for genetic differentiation and also estimate the magnitude and directionality of historic matrilineal gene flow between putative populations. Our results indicate that maternally directed site fidelity drives significant genetic population structure between breeding stocks within ocean basins. However, patterns of connectivity differ across the circumpolar range, possibly as a result of differences in the extent of longitudinal movements on feeding areas. The number of population comparisons observed to be significantly differentiated were found to diminish at the subpopulation scale when nucleotide differences were examined, indicating that more complex processes underlie genetic structure at this scale. It is crucial that these complexities and uncertainties are afforded greater consideration in management and regulatory efforts.},
keywords = {Arabian Sea, breeding grounds, Genetic differentiation, Humpback Whale, megaptera novaeangliae, mtDNA, population structure, Stock assessment},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Sutaria, D.,Sule, M.,Jog, K.,Bopardikar, I.,Jamalabad, A.,Panicker, D.
Baleen Whale Records from India Technical Report
no. 241, 2017, ISBN: SC/67A/CMP/03_Rev.
Abstract | BibTeX | Tags: acoustics, Arabian Gulf, Arabian Sea, balaenoptera edeni, balaenoptera musculus, Blue whale, Bryde's whale, Entanglement, Humpback Whale, megaptera novaeangliae, Persian Gulf, ship strike, song, stranding
@techreport{,
title = {Baleen Whale Records from India},
author = {Sutaria, D.,Sule, M.,Jog, K.,Bopardikar, I.,Jamalabad, A.,Panicker, D.},
issn = { SC/67A/CMP/03_Rev},
year = {2017},
date = {2017-01-01},
journal = {Document presented to the meeting of the Scientific Committee of the International Whaling Commission},
number = {241},
pages = {16},
abstract = {The current presence of three baleen whale species, the blue whale (Balaenoptera musculus), Bryde’s
whale (Balaenoptera edeni) and the humpback whale (Megaptera novaeangliae) was assessed along
the Indian coastline via sighting and stranding records. The available literature was reviewed to
understand the frequency and distribution of stranding events along the coastline. Fisherfolk were
interviewed to obtain information on baleen whale sightings and community perceptions towards
whales. We found that blue and Bryde’s whales are recorded from both the east and west coasts and
humpback whales from the west coast only. During 2015-2016, the majority of strandings were
reported from Maharashtra and Karnataka. In March 2017, at least one humpback whale sighting was
confirmed from recorded vocalisations off the Goa coast. An investigation of the ongoing fisheries has
also revealed a steep decline in commercial fisheries and an 82% decline in the Sardines in 2015-16.
With this scenario in mind, we recommend continuation of dedicated baleen whale surveys and
collaborative efforts with local regional authorities to carry out in-depth analyses of strandings and
document the ecology of whales in Indian waters.},
keywords = {acoustics, Arabian Gulf, Arabian Sea, balaenoptera edeni, balaenoptera musculus, Blue whale, Bryde's whale, Entanglement, Humpback Whale, megaptera novaeangliae, Persian Gulf, ship strike, song, stranding},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {techreport}
}
whale (Balaenoptera edeni) and the humpback whale (Megaptera novaeangliae) was assessed along
the Indian coastline via sighting and stranding records. The available literature was reviewed to
understand the frequency and distribution of stranding events along the coastline. Fisherfolk were
interviewed to obtain information on baleen whale sightings and community perceptions towards
whales. We found that blue and Bryde’s whales are recorded from both the east and west coasts and
humpback whales from the west coast only. During 2015-2016, the majority of strandings were
reported from Maharashtra and Karnataka. In March 2017, at least one humpback whale sighting was
confirmed from recorded vocalisations off the Goa coast. An investigation of the ongoing fisheries has
also revealed a steep decline in commercial fisheries and an 82% decline in the Sardines in 2015-16.
With this scenario in mind, we recommend continuation of dedicated baleen whale surveys and
collaborative efforts with local regional authorities to carry out in-depth analyses of strandings and
document the ecology of whales in Indian waters.
Willson, A.,Baldwin, R.,Collins, T.,Godley, B.J.,Minton, G.,Al Harthi, S.,Pikesley, Stephen K,Witt, Matthew J
Preliminary ensemble ecological niche modelling of Arabian Sea humpback whale vessel sightings and satellite telemetry data Technical Report
no. 502, 2017, ISBN: SC/67A/CMP/15.
Abstract | BibTeX | Tags: Arabian Gulf, Arabian Sea, ensemble niche modeling, habitat modelling, habitat preference, Humpback Whale, megaptera novaeangliae, Persian Gulf, Satellite telemetry
@techreport{,
title = {Preliminary ensemble ecological niche modelling of Arabian Sea humpback whale vessel sightings and satellite telemetry data},
author = {Willson, A.,Baldwin, R.,Collins, T.,Godley, B.J.,Minton, G.,Al Harthi, S.,Pikesley, Stephen K,Witt, Matthew J},
issn = { SC/67A/CMP/15},
year = {2017},
date = {2017-01-01},
journal = {Document presented to the meeting of the Scientific Committee of the International Whaling Commission},
number = {502},
pages = {17},
abstract = {Ensemble ecological niche modelling (EENM) can provide insight into the relationship between marine mammals and
their environment and can predict distribution beyond the range of observed locations. The technique can be used to
identify sites for future field research and guide conservation and management activities. The spatial ecology of Arabian
Sea humpback whales (ASHWs) has been described off the coast of Oman, although a paucity of information exists
from which to describe their distribution across the rest of their potential range. Here we present an ensemble ecological
niche modelling framework to predict habitat suitability of ASHWs across the north Indian Ocean. Sightings data from
Oman-based small vessel surveys (2003-2014) and satellite telemetry records (2014-2016) were used along with
environmental co-variate data from a season between December and May. Net primary productivity featured as the only
co-variate with a strong influence on models for both datasets. Model test evaluation metrics scored >0.9, and mapped
outputs of likely distribution highlighted spatial similarity across multiple models. Telemetry data predicted suitable
habitat to be further offshore than the models derived from sightings data. All resulting distribution maps described
areas of high suitability (index value <0.75) along the southern and central coast of Oman and of the northern Arabian
Sea between the Gulf of Kutch and sub-marine canyon features off the Indus delta. There was good spatial concordance
between ensemble model predictions with actual locations of Soviet catches of humpback whales in the northern Indian
Ocean between 1964 and 1966. Both the telemetry and the sightings data were temporally sporadic in their coverage
(across months) and biologically biased (towards males) and as such results from our preliminary efforts should be
considered in light of these caveats. However, these preliminary results are valuable and indicate likely co-occurrence
with high density shipping traffic routes in the region and target additional areas for focussed field surveys. Results
from this study should be considered together with results of recent north Indian Ocean blue whale ENM studies to help
guide future research and conservation management objectives in the region.},
keywords = {Arabian Gulf, Arabian Sea, ensemble niche modeling, habitat modelling, habitat preference, Humpback Whale, megaptera novaeangliae, Persian Gulf, Satellite telemetry},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {techreport}
}
their environment and can predict distribution beyond the range of observed locations. The technique can be used to
identify sites for future field research and guide conservation and management activities. The spatial ecology of Arabian
Sea humpback whales (ASHWs) has been described off the coast of Oman, although a paucity of information exists
from which to describe their distribution across the rest of their potential range. Here we present an ensemble ecological
niche modelling framework to predict habitat suitability of ASHWs across the north Indian Ocean. Sightings data from
Oman-based small vessel surveys (2003-2014) and satellite telemetry records (2014-2016) were used along with
environmental co-variate data from a season between December and May. Net primary productivity featured as the only
co-variate with a strong influence on models for both datasets. Model test evaluation metrics scored >0.9, and mapped
outputs of likely distribution highlighted spatial similarity across multiple models. Telemetry data predicted suitable
habitat to be further offshore than the models derived from sightings data. All resulting distribution maps described
areas of high suitability (index value <0.75) along the southern and central coast of Oman and of the northern Arabian
Sea between the Gulf of Kutch and sub-marine canyon features off the Indus delta. There was good spatial concordance
between ensemble model predictions with actual locations of Soviet catches of humpback whales in the northern Indian
Ocean between 1964 and 1966. Both the telemetry and the sightings data were temporally sporadic in their coverage
(across months) and biologically biased (towards males) and as such results from our preliminary efforts should be
considered in light of these caveats. However, these preliminary results are valuable and indicate likely co-occurrence
with high density shipping traffic routes in the region and target additional areas for focussed field surveys. Results
from this study should be considered together with results of recent north Indian Ocean blue whale ENM studies to help
guide future research and conservation management objectives in the region.
Allison, C.
IWC individual catch database Version 6.1 Journal Article
In: vol. Version 18 July, 2016, no. 6, 2016.
BibTeX | Tags: Arabian Sea, Blue whale, Bryde’s whale, catch, Distribution, Humpback Whale, Soviet whaling, sperm whale, whaling
@article{,
title = {IWC individual catch database Version 6.1},
author = {Allison, C.},
year = {2016},
date = {2016-01-01},
volume = {Version 18 July, 2016},
number = {6},
keywords = {Arabian Sea, Blue whale, Bryde’s whale, catch, Distribution, Humpback Whale, Soviet whaling, sperm whale, whaling},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Amaral, A. R.,Collins, T.,Minton, G.,Baldwin, R.,Willson, A.,Kershaw, Francine,Gray, H.,Findlay, K.,Brownell Jr, R.L.,Rosenbaum, H. C.
Update on Genetic Analyses of Arabian Sea Humpback Whales Technical Report
no. 9, 2016.
Abstract | BibTeX | Tags: Arabian Sea, breeding grounds, feeding grounds, genetics, Gulf of Masirah, Humpback Whale, megaptera novaeangliae, Microsatellite, sexing
@techreport{,
title = {Update on Genetic Analyses of Arabian Sea Humpback Whales},
author = {Amaral, A. R.,Collins, T.,Minton, G.,Baldwin, R.,Willson, A.,Kershaw, Francine,Gray, H.,Findlay, K.,Brownell Jr, R.L.,Rosenbaum, H. C.},
year = {2016},
date = {2016-01-01},
journal = {Working Paper presented to the Scientific Committee of the International Whaling Commission},
number = {9},
pages = {6},
publisher = {IWC},
abstract = {From the 49 new samples, 44 were successfully genotyped at 10 microsatellite loci. We identified 27 males and 17 females. Within this dataset, 7 duplicate samples were found. Five samples representing 3 individuals in the 2015 dataset registered as genotypic matches with animals sampled in the 2004 dataset. An additional 9 samples involving 6 individuals that represent potential matches between the 2015 and 2004 dataset are being reviewed to determine if they represent inter-year recaptures. As the data were generated very recently, further checks to clarify issues with some microsatellite loci will be completed. Six samples failed to amplify consistently for sexing markers and need to be revisited.
Analysis of the combined genotypic dataset will be completed by the end of June/early July 2016. The genotypic matches and sexing data will be incorporated into the Oman Photo-ID database, and used to generate robust updated photo-ID and genotypic mark-recapture estimates of population abundance. These data have also been used to determine or confirm the sex of the 9 satellite tagged whales off the coast of Oman (see SH28), and a significant number of other whales identified photographically off the coast of Oman. This will prove highly valuable if future satellite tagging efforts are undertaken in Oman, as previous tagging work has been significantly male-biased (See SH28), and future tagging should target known females.
Preliminary assessment of the new sexing data (although not yet fully complete) is providing valuable insight into possible difference in habitat use between the two primary study sites off the coast of Oman (see Figure 1). Minton et al. (2011) documented a heavy bias toward males in Dhofar and a ratio near parity in the Gulf of Masirah. These results were based on the total number of photographic captures of known sex individuals. The combination of new and old sexing information allows for a more nuanced examination of this phenomenon: the male-female ratio based on individual whales for which sex was determined in each study site (regardless of how frequently they were observed) is 2:1 in Dhofar (n=30), whilst in the Gulf of Masirah this ratio is slightly biased toward females, with 45% of individuals of known sex observed in that study area being male, and 55% female (n=49). More detailed analysis of these sexing data in relation to survey effort and photographic identification data will yield further important insights into habitat use, behaviour, and social interactions, critical for the conservation of this population.},
keywords = {Arabian Sea, breeding grounds, feeding grounds, genetics, Gulf of Masirah, Humpback Whale, megaptera novaeangliae, Microsatellite, sexing},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {techreport}
}
Analysis of the combined genotypic dataset will be completed by the end of June/early July 2016. The genotypic matches and sexing data will be incorporated into the Oman Photo-ID database, and used to generate robust updated photo-ID and genotypic mark-recapture estimates of population abundance. These data have also been used to determine or confirm the sex of the 9 satellite tagged whales off the coast of Oman (see SH28), and a significant number of other whales identified photographically off the coast of Oman. This will prove highly valuable if future satellite tagging efforts are undertaken in Oman, as previous tagging work has been significantly male-biased (See SH28), and future tagging should target known females.
Preliminary assessment of the new sexing data (although not yet fully complete) is providing valuable insight into possible difference in habitat use between the two primary study sites off the coast of Oman (see Figure 1). Minton et al. (2011) documented a heavy bias toward males in Dhofar and a ratio near parity in the Gulf of Masirah. These results were based on the total number of photographic captures of known sex individuals. The combination of new and old sexing information allows for a more nuanced examination of this phenomenon: the male-female ratio based on individual whales for which sex was determined in each study site (regardless of how frequently they were observed) is 2:1 in Dhofar (n=30), whilst in the Gulf of Masirah this ratio is slightly biased toward females, with 45% of individuals of known sex observed in that study area being male, and 55% female (n=49). More detailed analysis of these sexing data in relation to survey effort and photographic identification data will yield further important insights into habitat use, behaviour, and social interactions, critical for the conservation of this population.
Cerchio, S,Willson, A.,Muirhead, C.,Minton, G.,Collins, T.,Baldwin, R.,Sarrouf Willson, M.,Al Harthi, S.
Preliminary Report on Long-term Detection of Arabian Sea Humpback Whale Vocalizations off Oman Technical Report
no. 343, 2016.
Abstract | BibTeX | Tags: acoustic detection, Arabian Sea, behaviour, breeding grounds, Humpback Whale, megaptera novaeangliae, Oman, Passive acoustic detection, song
@techreport{,
title = {Preliminary Report on Long-term Detection of Arabian Sea Humpback Whale Vocalizations off Oman},
author = {Cerchio, S,Willson, A.,Muirhead, C.,Minton, G.,Collins, T.,Baldwin, R.,Sarrouf Willson, M.,Al Harthi, S.},
year = {2016},
date = {2016-01-01},
journal = {Report Presented to the Scientific Committee meeting of the International Whaling Commission},
number = {343},
publisher = {IWC},
abstract = {This report presents an overview of the progress to date on the humpback whale detection
component of the Arabian Sea Humpback Whale Acoustic Research program off Oman. Three
archival acoustic recorders were deployed at sites in two regions for approximately one year each,
in Hallaniyats Bay during 2011/2012, and the Gulf of Masirah during 2012/2013. Performance of
recorders varied among deployments, but despite some challenges due to equipment failures we
succeeded in documenting spatiotemporal patterns in the presence of humpback whales in a large
dataset. Several key findings broaden our understanding of the Arabian Sea humpback whale
population off Oman. There appears a strong seasonal component to the use of song by this
population, primarily from November through May, which is congruent with the Northern
Hemisphere breeding cycle and singing season. Throughout this period, singing was heard in both
Hallaniyats Bay and the Gulf of Masirah, separated by approximately 400km, indicating that the
population utilizes both of these regions. However, there was a much stronger presence in
Hallaniyats Bay, with song heard nearly 24 hours/day during the peak months, and song detected
simultaneously at multiple sites across the Bay. Previous boat-based survey data indicated similar
trends, however, given limitation in the duration of this fieldwork the current acoustic dataset
provides a more reliable indication of this population’s breeding related activity. This suggests that
the Hallaniyats Bay might serve as a more important habitat for breeding activity than the
monitored region of the Gulf of Masirah. There also appeared to be a subtle northward shift in
distribution of detections as the singing season progressed, both within Hallaniyats Bay, and from
Hallaniyats Bay to the Gulf of Masirah, suggesting a seasonal shift in distribution for singing males.
During the summer and autumn months, very little song was detected, however sparse detections
indicate that whales are present in both regions during at least some of this period. It is
recommended that similar acoustic monitoring be conducted in all range states of the population to
elucidate spatiotemporal distribution throughout the Arabian Sea.},
keywords = {acoustic detection, Arabian Sea, behaviour, breeding grounds, Humpback Whale, megaptera novaeangliae, Oman, Passive acoustic detection, song},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {techreport}
}
component of the Arabian Sea Humpback Whale Acoustic Research program off Oman. Three
archival acoustic recorders were deployed at sites in two regions for approximately one year each,
in Hallaniyats Bay during 2011/2012, and the Gulf of Masirah during 2012/2013. Performance of
recorders varied among deployments, but despite some challenges due to equipment failures we
succeeded in documenting spatiotemporal patterns in the presence of humpback whales in a large
dataset. Several key findings broaden our understanding of the Arabian Sea humpback whale
population off Oman. There appears a strong seasonal component to the use of song by this
population, primarily from November through May, which is congruent with the Northern
Hemisphere breeding cycle and singing season. Throughout this period, singing was heard in both
Hallaniyats Bay and the Gulf of Masirah, separated by approximately 400km, indicating that the
population utilizes both of these regions. However, there was a much stronger presence in
Hallaniyats Bay, with song heard nearly 24 hours/day during the peak months, and song detected
simultaneously at multiple sites across the Bay. Previous boat-based survey data indicated similar
trends, however, given limitation in the duration of this fieldwork the current acoustic dataset
provides a more reliable indication of this population’s breeding related activity. This suggests that
the Hallaniyats Bay might serve as a more important habitat for breeding activity than the
monitored region of the Gulf of Masirah. There also appeared to be a subtle northward shift in
distribution of detections as the singing season progressed, both within Hallaniyats Bay, and from
Hallaniyats Bay to the Gulf of Masirah, suggesting a seasonal shift in distribution for singing males.
During the summer and autumn months, very little song was detected, however sparse detections
indicate that whales are present in both regions during at least some of this period. It is
recommended that similar acoustic monitoring be conducted in all range states of the population to
elucidate spatiotemporal distribution throughout the Arabian Sea.
NOAA
Endangered and Threatened Species; Identification of 14 Distinct Population Segments of the Humpback Whale (Megaptera novaeangliae) and Revision of Species-wide Listing
2016.
Abstract | BibTeX | Tags: Arabian Sea, breeding grounds, conservation status, feeding grounds, Humpback Whale, marine mammal, megaptera novaeangliae, population status, USA
@{,
title = {Endangered and Threatened Species; Identification of 14 Distinct Population Segments of the Humpback Whale (Megaptera novaeangliae) and Revision of Species-wide Listing},
author = {NOAA},
issn = {Docket No. 130708594-6598-03},
year = {2016},
date = {2016-01-01},
number = {183},
pages = {247},
publisher = {Department of Commerce},
abstract = {We, NMFS, issue a final determination to revise the listing status of the
humpback whale (Megaptera novaeangliae) under the Endangered Species Act (ESA).
We divide the globally listed endangered species into 14 distinct population segments
(DPS), remove the current species-level listing, and in its place list four DPSs as
endangered and one DPS as threatened. Based on their current statuses, the remaining
nine DPSs do not warrant listing. At this time, we find that critical habitat is not
determinable for the three listed DPSs that occur in U.S. waters (Western North Pacific,
Mexico, Central America); we will consider designating critical habitat for these three
DPSs in a separate rulemaking. },
keywords = {Arabian Sea, breeding grounds, conservation status, feeding grounds, Humpback Whale, marine mammal, megaptera novaeangliae, population status, USA},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {}
}
humpback whale (Megaptera novaeangliae) under the Endangered Species Act (ESA).
We divide the globally listed endangered species into 14 distinct population segments
(DPS), remove the current species-level listing, and in its place list four DPSs as
endangered and one DPS as threatened. Based on their current statuses, the remaining
nine DPSs do not warrant listing. At this time, we find that critical habitat is not
determinable for the three listed DPSs that occur in U.S. waters (Western North Pacific,
Mexico, Central America); we will consider designating critical habitat for these three
DPSs in a separate rulemaking.
Willson, A.,Kowalik, J.,Godley, B.J.,Baldwin, R.,Struck, A.,Struck, L.,Nawaz, Rab,Witt, M.J.
Priorities for addressing whale and ship co-occurrence off the coast of Oman and the wider North Indian Ocean. Technical Report
no. 503, 2016.
Abstract | BibTeX | Tags: AIS, Blue whale, Humpback Whale, megaptera novaeangliae, mitigation, Oman, ship strike, vessel traffic, whales
@techreport{,
title = {Priorities for addressing whale and ship co-occurrence off the coast of Oman and the wider North Indian Ocean.},
author = {Willson, A.,Kowalik, J.,Godley, B.J.,Baldwin, R.,Struck, A.,Struck, L.,Nawaz, Rab,Witt, M.J.},
year = {2016},
date = {2016-01-01},
journal = {Report presented to the Scientific Committee of the International Whaling Commission},
number = {503},
pages = {13},
publisher = {IWC},
abstract = {Satellite telemetry studies and habitat density mapping of the endangered Arabian Sea humpback whale
(Megaptera novaeangliae) has revealed overlap with shipping off the coast of Oman. To date the only other
Northern Indian Ocean (NIO) study to determine the risk of mortality to whales (Baleanoptera musculus)
from shipping was completed in Sri Lanka. A demonstration exercise reviewing vessel traffic (from AIS
data) passing through coarsely defined habitat reveals that container vessels may provide the highest risk to
whales based on speed of vessels, and given a three fold increase in container traffic in the NIO region
between 2004 and 2014. Traffic density heat maps show shipping routes are predominantly distributed
around the periphery of the NIO area in close proximity to the continental shelf showing overlap with
historical records of takes of blue, humpback, sperm (Physester macrocephalus) and Bryde’s whales
(Baleanoptridae edeni) during Soviet whaling between 1964 and 1966. The review presents a case for
immediately commencing risk assessment work on humpback and ship co-occurrence in Oman whilst
undertaking a wider spatial assessment of the region to at least determine priority areas for study. Given
overlapping habitat use between species in certain areas, a multi-species approach to reviewing mitigation
options is recommended.},
keywords = {AIS, Blue whale, Humpback Whale, megaptera novaeangliae, mitigation, Oman, ship strike, vessel traffic, whales},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {techreport}
}
(Megaptera novaeangliae) has revealed overlap with shipping off the coast of Oman. To date the only other
Northern Indian Ocean (NIO) study to determine the risk of mortality to whales (Baleanoptera musculus)
from shipping was completed in Sri Lanka. A demonstration exercise reviewing vessel traffic (from AIS
data) passing through coarsely defined habitat reveals that container vessels may provide the highest risk to
whales based on speed of vessels, and given a three fold increase in container traffic in the NIO region
between 2004 and 2014. Traffic density heat maps show shipping routes are predominantly distributed
around the periphery of the NIO area in close proximity to the continental shelf showing overlap with
historical records of takes of blue, humpback, sperm (Physester macrocephalus) and Bryde’s whales
(Baleanoptridae edeni) during Soviet whaling between 1964 and 1966. The review presents a case for
immediately commencing risk assessment work on humpback and ship co-occurrence in Oman whilst
undertaking a wider spatial assessment of the region to at least determine priority areas for study. Given
overlapping habitat use between species in certain areas, a multi-species approach to reviewing mitigation
options is recommended.
Baldwin, R.,Willson, Andrew,Collins, T.J.Q.
Watching out for whales: industry responsibility to address threats to Arabian Sea humpback whales, Gulf of Masirah, Oman Technical Report
no. 312, 2015.
Abstract | BibTeX | Tags: Arabian Sea, Humpback Whale, megaptera novaeangliae, mitigation, seismic, ship strike, vessel traffic
@techreport{,
title = {Watching out for whales: industry responsibility to address threats to Arabian Sea humpback whales, Gulf of Masirah, Oman},
author = {Baldwin, R.,Willson, Andrew,Collins, T.J.Q.},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-01-01},
journal = {Report presented to the 66th meeting of the Scientific Committee of the International Whaling Commission},
number = {312},
pages = {10},
abstract = {Research on Arabian Sea humpback whales in Oman over the past 15 years has revealed that the Gulf of Masirah is a hot spot for this Endangered population and the only part of its known range where males and females are found at near parity. This information has been used by a partnership of industry, consultancy and NGO in Oman to develop mitigation related to port operations and hydrocarbon exploration in the area. This has included the development of a Whale Management and Mitigation Programme to be implemented by the Port of Duqm Company, as well as mitigation procedures that were used by a seismic survey contractor in late 2014. Impacts to whales nevertheless remain, including a collision between seismic equipment and a whale in December 2014, suggesting that further development of protection measures for the Arabian Sea humpback whale is still required. },
keywords = {Arabian Sea, Humpback Whale, megaptera novaeangliae, mitigation, seismic, ship strike, vessel traffic},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {techreport}
}
Bettridge, S,Baker, CS,Barlow, J,Clapham, PJ,Ford, M,Gouveia, D,Mattila, DK,Pace III, RM,Rosel, PE,Silber, GK
Status review of the humpback whale (Megaptera novaeangliae) under the Endangered Species Act. US Dep. Commer Journal Article
In: NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-SWFSC, vol. 540, no. 45, pp. 263, 2015.
Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: conservation status, Endangered species, Humpback Whale, megaptera novaeangliae, population status, USA
@article{,
title = {Status review of the humpback whale (Megaptera novaeangliae) under the Endangered Species Act. US Dep. Commer},
author = {Bettridge, S,Baker, CS,Barlow, J,Clapham, PJ,Ford, M,Gouveia, D,Mattila, DK,Pace III, RM,Rosel, PE,Silber, GK},
url = {https://repository.library.noaa.gov/view/noaa/4883},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-01-01},
journal = {NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-SWFSC},
volume = {540},
number = {45},
pages = {263},
abstract = {Humpback whales (Megaptera novaeangliae) were listed as endangered in 1970 under the
Endangered Species Conservation Act of 1969, the precursor to the Endangered Species Act
(ESA). When the ESA was enacted in 1973, humpback whales were included in the List of
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants (the List) as endangered and were considered as
“depleted” under the Marine Mammal Protection Act (MMPA).
In May 2010, the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) convened the Humpback Whale
Biological Review Team (BRT) to conduct a comprehensive review of the status of humpback
whales as the basis for considering revisions to this species’ listing status. The ESA, as amended
in 1978, defines a species to be “any subspecies of fish or wildlife or plants, and any distinct
population segment of any species of vertebrate fish or wildlife which interbreeds when mature”
(Section 3(16)). Guidance on what constitutes a “distinct population segment” (DPS) is provided
by the joint NMFS-Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) interagency policy on vertebrate
populations (61 FR 4722, 7 February 1996). To be considered a DPS, a population, or group of
populations, must be “discrete” from the remainder of the taxon to which it belongs; and
“significant” to the taxon to which it belongs. Information on distribution, ecological situation,
genetics, and other factors is used to evaluate a population’s discreteness and significance.
Conducting an ESA status review therefore involves two key tasks: identifying the taxonomic
units (species, subspecies or DPS) to be evaluated, and assessing the risk of extinction for each
of these units.
Identification of Distinct Population Segments
Humpback whales are found in all oceans of the world with a broad geographical range from
tropical to temperate waters in the Northern Hemisphere and from tropical to near-ice-edge
waters in the Southern Hemisphere. Nearly all populations undertake seasonal migrations
between their tropical and sub-tropical winter calving and breeding grounds1 and high-latitude
summer feeding grounds.
Humpback whales are currently considered to be a monotypic species, but whales from the
Northern and Southern Hemispheres differ from each other substantially in a number of traits,
including coloration, timing of reproduction and migratory behavior, diet, and molecular genetic
characteristics. Within the Northern Hemisphere, populations from the Atlantic and Pacific also
differ markedly in molecular genetic traits and coloration patterns, with no evidence of exchange
of individuals between these ocean basins. In the Northern Indian Ocean, a population
inhabiting the Arabian Sea is also markedly divergent in molecular and behavioral characteristics
from all other populations globally. Whales from these four areas (North Pacific, North Atlantic,
Southern Hemisphere, and Arabian Sea) were so divergent that the BRT considered the
possibility that they might reasonably be considered different sub-species, and enlisted the aid of
the Committee on Taxonomy of the Society for Marine Mammalogy to help address this
question. The committee concluded that if a taxonomic revision of humpback whales were to be
undertaken, it is likely that the North Atlantic, North Pacific and Southern Hemisphere groups
In this document, the term “breeding ground” refers to areas in tropical or subtropical waters where humpback
whales migrate in winter to mate and give birth to calves.
would be recognized as sub-species. The BRT therefore largely focused on the question of
whether any DPS could be identified within each of these major ocean basins, although we also
evaluated whether any DPS so identified would also be discrete and significant if evaluated with
reference to the entire global species.
Population structure in humpback whales has been previously evaluated both for breeding areas
and feeding areas. In applying the discreteness and significance criteria, the BRT focused on
breeding populations as the units that could be identified as DPSs, consistent with the language
in the ESA that species (including DPS) “interbreed when mature.” Information on where a
breeding population feeds, however, was considered in evaluating both the significance and
discreteness of that population.
The BRT evaluated genetic data, tagging and photographic-ID data, demographic information,
geographic barriers, and stranding data, and determined that there are at least 15 DPS of
humpback whales. Significant differences in patterns of genetic variation and information on the
rates of exchange of individuals among breeding areas were particularly important for evaluating
population discreteness, and patterns of geographic occurrence, differences in ecology among
feeding and in some cases breeding areas, and degree of genetic differentiation were most
important for determining significance.
Based on this information, the BRT identified the following humpback whale distinct population
segments, named after their primary breeding locations (Figure 1):
1. West Indies
2. Cape Verde Islands/Northwest Africa
3. Hawaii
4. Central America
5. Mexico
6. Okinawa/Philippines
7. Second West Pacific (exact location unknown)
8. West Australia
9. East Australia
10. Oceania
11. Southeastern Pacific
12. Brazil
13. Gabon/Southwest Africa
14. Southeast Africa/ Madagascar
15. Arabian Sea},
keywords = {conservation status, Endangered species, Humpback Whale, megaptera novaeangliae, population status, USA},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Endangered Species Conservation Act of 1969, the precursor to the Endangered Species Act
(ESA). When the ESA was enacted in 1973, humpback whales were included in the List of
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants (the List) as endangered and were considered as
“depleted” under the Marine Mammal Protection Act (MMPA).
In May 2010, the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) convened the Humpback Whale
Biological Review Team (BRT) to conduct a comprehensive review of the status of humpback
whales as the basis for considering revisions to this species’ listing status. The ESA, as amended
in 1978, defines a species to be “any subspecies of fish or wildlife or plants, and any distinct
population segment of any species of vertebrate fish or wildlife which interbreeds when mature”
(Section 3(16)). Guidance on what constitutes a “distinct population segment” (DPS) is provided
by the joint NMFS-Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) interagency policy on vertebrate
populations (61 FR 4722, 7 February 1996). To be considered a DPS, a population, or group of
populations, must be “discrete” from the remainder of the taxon to which it belongs; and
“significant” to the taxon to which it belongs. Information on distribution, ecological situation,
genetics, and other factors is used to evaluate a population’s discreteness and significance.
Conducting an ESA status review therefore involves two key tasks: identifying the taxonomic
units (species, subspecies or DPS) to be evaluated, and assessing the risk of extinction for each
of these units.
Identification of Distinct Population Segments
Humpback whales are found in all oceans of the world with a broad geographical range from
tropical to temperate waters in the Northern Hemisphere and from tropical to near-ice-edge
waters in the Southern Hemisphere. Nearly all populations undertake seasonal migrations
between their tropical and sub-tropical winter calving and breeding grounds1 and high-latitude
summer feeding grounds.
Humpback whales are currently considered to be a monotypic species, but whales from the
Northern and Southern Hemispheres differ from each other substantially in a number of traits,
including coloration, timing of reproduction and migratory behavior, diet, and molecular genetic
characteristics. Within the Northern Hemisphere, populations from the Atlantic and Pacific also
differ markedly in molecular genetic traits and coloration patterns, with no evidence of exchange
of individuals between these ocean basins. In the Northern Indian Ocean, a population
inhabiting the Arabian Sea is also markedly divergent in molecular and behavioral characteristics
from all other populations globally. Whales from these four areas (North Pacific, North Atlantic,
Southern Hemisphere, and Arabian Sea) were so divergent that the BRT considered the
possibility that they might reasonably be considered different sub-species, and enlisted the aid of
the Committee on Taxonomy of the Society for Marine Mammalogy to help address this
question. The committee concluded that if a taxonomic revision of humpback whales were to be
undertaken, it is likely that the North Atlantic, North Pacific and Southern Hemisphere groups
In this document, the term “breeding ground” refers to areas in tropical or subtropical waters where humpback
whales migrate in winter to mate and give birth to calves.
would be recognized as sub-species. The BRT therefore largely focused on the question of
whether any DPS could be identified within each of these major ocean basins, although we also
evaluated whether any DPS so identified would also be discrete and significant if evaluated with
reference to the entire global species.
Population structure in humpback whales has been previously evaluated both for breeding areas
and feeding areas. In applying the discreteness and significance criteria, the BRT focused on
breeding populations as the units that could be identified as DPSs, consistent with the language
in the ESA that species (including DPS) “interbreed when mature.” Information on where a
breeding population feeds, however, was considered in evaluating both the significance and
discreteness of that population.
The BRT evaluated genetic data, tagging and photographic-ID data, demographic information,
geographic barriers, and stranding data, and determined that there are at least 15 DPS of
humpback whales. Significant differences in patterns of genetic variation and information on the
rates of exchange of individuals among breeding areas were particularly important for evaluating
population discreteness, and patterns of geographic occurrence, differences in ecology among
feeding and in some cases breeding areas, and degree of genetic differentiation were most
important for determining significance.
Based on this information, the BRT identified the following humpback whale distinct population
segments, named after their primary breeding locations (Figure 1):
1. West Indies
2. Cape Verde Islands/Northwest Africa
3. Hawaii
4. Central America
5. Mexico
6. Okinawa/Philippines
7. Second West Pacific (exact location unknown)
8. West Australia
9. East Australia
10. Oceania
11. Southeastern Pacific
12. Brazil
13. Gabon/Southwest Africa
14. Southeast Africa/ Madagascar
15. Arabian Sea
Escalle, L.,Capietto, A.,Chavance, P.,Dubroca, L.,Delgado De Molina, A.,Murua, H.,Gaertner, D.,Romanov, E.,Spitz, J.,Kiszka, J. J.,Floch, L.,Damiano, A.,Merigot, B.
Cetaceans and tuna purse seine fisheries in the Atlantic and Indian Oceans: interactions but few mortalities Journal Article
In: Marine Ecology Progress Series, vol. 522, no. 370, pp. 255-268, 2015.
Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: Atlantic, Bycatch, cetaceans, Humpback Whale, Indian Ocean, megaptera novaeangliae, purse-Seine, tuna fishery
@article{,
title = {Cetaceans and tuna purse seine fisheries in the Atlantic and Indian Oceans: interactions but few mortalities},
author = {Escalle, L.,Capietto, A.,Chavance, P.,Dubroca, L.,Delgado De Molina, A.,Murua, H.,Gaertner, D.,Romanov, E.,Spitz, J.,Kiszka, J. J.,Floch, L.,Damiano, A.,Merigot, B.},
url = {http://www.int-res.com/abstracts/meps/v522/p255-268/},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-01-01},
journal = {Marine Ecology Progress Series},
volume = {522},
number = {370},
pages = {255-268},
abstract = {ABSTRACT: Fisheries bycatch is considered to be one of the most significant causes of mortality for many marine species, including vulnerable megafauna. In the open ocean, tuna purse seiners are known to use several cetacean species to detect tuna schools. This exposes the cetaceans to encirclement which can lead to incidental injury or death. While interactions between fishers and cetaceans have been well documented in the eastern tropical Pacific Ocean, little is known about these interactions and potential mortalities in the tropical Atlantic and Indian Oceans. Here, we provide the first quantification of these interactions in both oceans by analyzing a large database of captain’s logbooks (1980 to 2011) and observations collected by onboard scientific observers (1995 to 2011). Distribution maps of sightings per unit effort highlighted main areas of relatively high co-occurrence: east of the Seychelles (December to March), the Mozambique Channel (April to May) and the offshore waters of Gabon (April to September). The percentage of cetacean-associated fishing sets was around 3% in both oceans and datasets whereas 0.6% of sets had cetaceans encircled. Of the 194 cetaceans encircled in a purse seine net (122 baleen whales, 72 delphinids), immediate apparent survival rates were high (Atlantic: 92%, Indian: 100%). Among recorded mortalities, 8 involved pantropical spotted dolphins \textit{Stenella attenuata} and 3 involved humpback whales \textit{Megaptera novaeangliae}. These high survival rates suggest that setting nets close to cetaceans has a low immediate apparent impact on the species involved. Our findings will contribute to the development of an ecosystem approach to managing fisheries and accurate cetacean conservation measures.},
keywords = {Atlantic, Bycatch, cetaceans, Humpback Whale, Indian Ocean, megaptera novaeangliae, purse-Seine, tuna fishery},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Mahanty, Madan M,Latha, G,Thirunavukkarasu, A
Analysis of humpback whale sounds in shallow waters of the Southeastern Arabian Sea: An indication of breeding habitat Journal Article
In: Journal of biosciences, vol. 40, no. 148, pp. 407-417, 2015, ISBN: 0250-5991.
Abstract | BibTeX | Tags: Arabian Sea, behaviour, breeding grounds, Humpback Whale, India, megaptera novaeangliae, song
@article{,
title = {Analysis of humpback whale sounds in shallow waters of the Southeastern Arabian Sea: An indication of breeding habitat},
author = {Mahanty, Madan M,Latha, G,Thirunavukkarasu, A},
issn = {0250-5991},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-01-01},
journal = {Journal of biosciences},
volume = {40},
number = {148},
pages = {407-417},
abstract = {The primary objective of this work was to present the acoustical identification of humpback whales, detected by using
an autonomous ambient noise measurement system, deployed in the shallow waters of the Southeastern Arabian Sea
(SEAS) during the period January to May 2011. Seven types of sounds were detected. These were characteristically
upsweeps and downsweeps along with harmonics. Sounds produced repeatedly in a specific pattern were referred to as
phrases (PQRS and ABC). Repeated phrases in a particular pattern were referred to as themes, and from the
spectrographic analysis, two themes (I and II) were identified. The variation in the acoustic characteristics such as
fundamental frequency, range, duration of the sound unit, and the structure of the phrases and themes are discussed.
Sound units were recorded from mid-January to mid-March, with a peak in February, when the mean SST is ~28°C,
and no presence was recorded after mid-March. The temporal and thematic structures strongly determine the functions
of the humpback whale song form. Given the use of song in the SEAS, this area is possibly used as an active breeding
habitat by humpback whales during the winter season.},
keywords = {Arabian Sea, behaviour, breeding grounds, Humpback Whale, India, megaptera novaeangliae, song},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
an autonomous ambient noise measurement system, deployed in the shallow waters of the Southeastern Arabian Sea
(SEAS) during the period January to May 2011. Seven types of sounds were detected. These were characteristically
upsweeps and downsweeps along with harmonics. Sounds produced repeatedly in a specific pattern were referred to as
phrases (PQRS and ABC). Repeated phrases in a particular pattern were referred to as themes, and from the
spectrographic analysis, two themes (I and II) were identified. The variation in the acoustic characteristics such as
fundamental frequency, range, duration of the sound unit, and the structure of the phrases and themes are discussed.
Sound units were recorded from mid-January to mid-March, with a peak in February, when the mean SST is ~28°C,
and no presence was recorded after mid-March. The temporal and thematic structures strongly determine the functions
of the humpback whale song form. Given the use of song in the SEAS, this area is possibly used as an active breeding
habitat by humpback whales during the winter season.
Minton, G.,Reeves, R. R.,Collins, T.J.Q.,Willson, Andrew
Report on the Arabian Sea Humpback Whale Workshop: Developing a collaborative research and conservation strategy Technical Report
no. 417, 2015.
Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: Arabian Sea, conservation, Humpback Whale, management, megaptera novaeangliae
@techreport{,
title = {Report on the Arabian Sea Humpback Whale Workshop: Developing a collaborative research and conservation strategy},
author = {Minton, G.,Reeves, R. R.,Collins, T.J.Q.,Willson, Andrew},
url = {https://arabianseawhalenetwork.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/arabian-sea-humpback-whale-workshop-report-_final2-1.pdf},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-01-01},
number = {417},
pages = {50},
abstract = {Executive Summary
Humpback whales in the Arabian Sea (ASHWs) form a discrete population that is designated as an endangered
“subpopulation” on the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. The primary objective of the workshop was to
bring together regional scientists and conservationists who share concern for ASHWs (and other cetaceans in
the region) and to begin developing a unified, collaborative research and conservation strategy that could be
readily communicated to governments, intergovernmental organizations non-governmental organizations,
donors and research colleagues.
Researchers and international experts presented summaries of what is known about the distribution, biology
and threats to humpback whales in each of the represented Arabian Sea range states, as well as information
about research techniques and tools for collaboration that could facilitate the implementation of a regional
conservation-based research strategy.
Participants identified the main threats to whales in the region and knowledge gaps that must be filled in order
to assess and protect ASHWs. Almost all current knowledge about this population is based on data collected in
the Sultanate of Oman, which is the only country in which dedicated humpback whale research has taken
place in recent years. The shortage of information on the population’s full range and population size outside
of Oman is one of the most significant impediments to the pursuit of a regional conservation strategy. Many
of the workshop recommendations focus on harnessing the formal and informal networks and capacity of
participants to fill these knowledge gaps.
The workshop made the following recommendations for follow-up action:
1. Form an Arabian Sea Humpback Whale Research Network: To include development of a mission
statement and objectives and a clear set of conservation- and research-related roles for the members
2. Identify a focal point in each ASHW range state responsible for liaising with the network coordination
team and for 1) verification and documentation of all ASHW stranding and sighting reports, 2)
working with local communities, coastguards and others to collect data opportunistically and 3)
assistance in drafting funding proposals and research plans for country-based or cross-border priority
areas (in the most likely suspected current range of ASHW)
3. Develop a common (web-based) platform for sharing documents, data and research protocols among
network members. To include, if possible, a regional Photo-ID matching platform.
4. Establish data-sharing agreements for any web-based/group-wide data repositories, and memoranda
of understanding between partners who embark on shared analyses to ensure proper data ownership
and publication rights.
5. Produce a "glossy” presentation of ASHW background and conservation concerns that network
partners can use to raise awareness and attract funding.
6. Engage in dedicated fund-raising efforts to support network coordination and research activities at
both national and regional scales.
7. Implement regional research activities that include passive acoustic monitoring at strategic locations,
dedicated boat surveys for genetic sampling, photo-Identification and collecting data on distribution
and numbers, and further analyses of acoustic and genetic data already obtained from Oman and
other locations.
8. Create a common pool of equipment and other resources that can be used for research and analysis
in different range states as required
4
9. Encourage Master’s and PhD candidates from range states to conduct research and conservation
work on ASHWs.
10. Execute a large-scale GIS exercise - mapping all known/confirmed ASHW sightings (with effort indices
when available) and strandings for analysis of spatial/temporal trends, as well as overlap with known
threats (e.g. shipping lanes, high-density fisheries that use gillnets or vertical lines, oil and gas
exploration and development sites).
11. Maintain liaisons with international and inter-governmental organisations that can support the
network’s aims and objectives and ensure that network findings/results are applied toward regional
and international management and conservation frameworks.},
keywords = {Arabian Sea, conservation, Humpback Whale, management, megaptera novaeangliae},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {techreport}
}
Humpback whales in the Arabian Sea (ASHWs) form a discrete population that is designated as an endangered
“subpopulation” on the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. The primary objective of the workshop was to
bring together regional scientists and conservationists who share concern for ASHWs (and other cetaceans in
the region) and to begin developing a unified, collaborative research and conservation strategy that could be
readily communicated to governments, intergovernmental organizations non-governmental organizations,
donors and research colleagues.
Researchers and international experts presented summaries of what is known about the distribution, biology
and threats to humpback whales in each of the represented Arabian Sea range states, as well as information
about research techniques and tools for collaboration that could facilitate the implementation of a regional
conservation-based research strategy.
Participants identified the main threats to whales in the region and knowledge gaps that must be filled in order
to assess and protect ASHWs. Almost all current knowledge about this population is based on data collected in
the Sultanate of Oman, which is the only country in which dedicated humpback whale research has taken
place in recent years. The shortage of information on the population’s full range and population size outside
of Oman is one of the most significant impediments to the pursuit of a regional conservation strategy. Many
of the workshop recommendations focus on harnessing the formal and informal networks and capacity of
participants to fill these knowledge gaps.
The workshop made the following recommendations for follow-up action:
1. Form an Arabian Sea Humpback Whale Research Network: To include development of a mission
statement and objectives and a clear set of conservation- and research-related roles for the members
2. Identify a focal point in each ASHW range state responsible for liaising with the network coordination
team and for 1) verification and documentation of all ASHW stranding and sighting reports, 2)
working with local communities, coastguards and others to collect data opportunistically and 3)
assistance in drafting funding proposals and research plans for country-based or cross-border priority
areas (in the most likely suspected current range of ASHW)
3. Develop a common (web-based) platform for sharing documents, data and research protocols among
network members. To include, if possible, a regional Photo-ID matching platform.
4. Establish data-sharing agreements for any web-based/group-wide data repositories, and memoranda
of understanding between partners who embark on shared analyses to ensure proper data ownership
and publication rights.
5. Produce a "glossy” presentation of ASHW background and conservation concerns that network
partners can use to raise awareness and attract funding.
6. Engage in dedicated fund-raising efforts to support network coordination and research activities at
both national and regional scales.
7. Implement regional research activities that include passive acoustic monitoring at strategic locations,
dedicated boat surveys for genetic sampling, photo-Identification and collecting data on distribution
and numbers, and further analyses of acoustic and genetic data already obtained from Oman and
other locations.
8. Create a common pool of equipment and other resources that can be used for research and analysis
in different range states as required
4
9. Encourage Master’s and PhD candidates from range states to conduct research and conservation
work on ASHWs.
10. Execute a large-scale GIS exercise - mapping all known/confirmed ASHW sightings (with effort indices
when available) and strandings for analysis of spatial/temporal trends, as well as overlap with known
threats (e.g. shipping lanes, high-density fisheries that use gillnets or vertical lines, oil and gas
exploration and development sites).
11. Maintain liaisons with international and inter-governmental organisations that can support the
network’s aims and objectives and ensure that network findings/results are applied toward regional
and international management and conservation frameworks.
Willson, A.,Baldwin, R.,Cerchio, S,Collins,T.,Findlay, K.,Gray, H.,Godley, B.J.,Al Harthi, S.,Kennedy, A.,Minton, G.,Zerbini, A.N.,Witt, M.J.
Research update of satellite tracking studies of male Arabian Sea humpback whales; Oman Technical Report
no. 501, 2015, ISBN: SC/66a/SH/22 Rev 1.
Abstract | BibTeX | Tags: Humpback Whale, megaptera novaeangliae, mitigation, Oman, photo identification, Satellite telemetry, Threats
@techreport{,
title = {Research update of satellite tracking studies of male Arabian Sea humpback whales; Oman},
author = {Willson, A.,Baldwin, R.,Cerchio, S,Collins,T.,Findlay, K.,Gray, H.,Godley, B.J.,Al Harthi, S.,Kennedy, A.,Minton, G.,Zerbini, A.N.,Witt, M.J.},
issn = {SC/66a/SH/22 Rev 1},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-01-01},
number = {501},
pages = {12},
abstract = {Satellite tags were deployed on three adult male humpback whales (Megaptera novaeangliae) encountered off the southern coast of Oman during March 2015. This represents the second year of a telemetry study that began with the tagging of three whales in 2014 and forms part of a broader scientific research programme initiated in 2000 to understand the population biology and spatial ecology of Endangered Arabian Sea humpback whales. Tags were deployed in an area commonly associated with the seasonal presence of singing whales. Resightings of whales tagged in 2014 (n=3), supported by photographic evidence of two animals, showed normal healing of epidermal tissue around the tag site over a period of 9 to 11 months. A repeat tagging of one known individual (tagged in 2014) as well as two other known individuals in the Oman photo-ID database provides further evidence for high site fidelity of males to the tagging site as well as the Gulf of Masirah. Habitat utilization inferred from telemetry and vessel survey data have confirmed the urgent need for mitigation measures in high-risk areas and have led to an improved understanding of humpback whale spatial ecology across the wider region.},
keywords = {Humpback Whale, megaptera novaeangliae, mitigation, Oman, photo identification, Satellite telemetry, Threats},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {techreport}
}
Pomilla, Cristina,Amaral, Ana R.,Collins, Tim,Minton, Gianna,Findlay, Ken,Leslie, Matthew S.,Ponnampalam, Louisa,Baldwin, Robert,Rosenbaum, Howard
The World's Most Isolated and Distinct Whale Population? Humpback Whales of the Arabian Sea Journal Article
In: PLoS ONE, vol. 9, no. 194, pp. e114162, 2014.
Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: Arabian Sea, Evolution, Genetic differentiation, Humpback Whale, megaptera novaeangliae, migration, population identity, Stock identity, Threats
@article{,
title = {The World's Most Isolated and Distinct Whale Population? Humpback Whales of the Arabian Sea},
author = {Pomilla, Cristina,Amaral, Ana R.,Collins, Tim,Minton, Gianna,Findlay, Ken,Leslie, Matthew S.,Ponnampalam, Louisa,Baldwin, Robert,Rosenbaum, Howard},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0114162},
year = {2014},
date = {2014-01-01},
journal = {PLoS ONE},
volume = {9},
number = {194},
pages = {e114162},
publisher = {Public Library of Science},
abstract = {A clear understanding of population structure is essential for assessing conservation status and implementing management strategies. A small, non-migratory population of humpback whales in the Arabian Sea is classified as “Endangered” on the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species, an assessment constrained by a lack of data, including limited understanding of its relationship to other populations. We analysed 11 microsatellite markers and mitochondrial DNA sequences extracted from 67 Arabian Sea humpback whale tissue samples and compared them to equivalent datasets from the Southern Hemisphere and North Pacific. Results show that the Arabian Sea population is highly distinct; estimates of gene flow and divergence times suggest a Southern Indian Ocean origin but indicate that it has been isolated for approximately 70,000 years, remarkable for a species that is typically highly migratory. Genetic diversity values are significantly lower than those obtained for Southern Hemisphere populations and signatures of ancient and recent genetic bottlenecks were identified. Our findings suggest this is the world's most isolated humpback whale population, which, when combined with low population abundance estimates and anthropogenic threats, raises concern for its survival. We recommend an amendment of the status of the population to “Critically Endangered” on the IUCN Red List.
},
keywords = {Arabian Sea, Evolution, Genetic differentiation, Humpback Whale, megaptera novaeangliae, migration, population identity, Stock identity, Threats},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
A clear understanding of population structure is essential for assessing conservation status and implementing management strategies. A small, non-migratory population of humpback whales in the Arabian Sea is classified as “Endangered” on the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species, an assessment constrained by a lack of data, including limited understanding of its relationship to other populations. We analysed 11 microsatellite markers and mitochondrial DNA sequences extracted from 67 Arabian Sea humpback whale tissue samples and compared them to equivalent datasets from the Southern Hemisphere and North Pacific. Results show that the Arabian Sea population is highly distinct; estimates of gene flow and divergence times suggest a Southern Indian Ocean origin but indicate that it has been isolated for approximately 70,000 years, remarkable for a species that is typically highly migratory. Genetic diversity values are significantly lower than those obtained for Southern Hemisphere populations and signatures of ancient and recent genetic bottlenecks were identified. Our findings suggest this is the world's most isolated humpback whale population, which, when combined with low population abundance estimates and anthropogenic threats, raises concern for its survival. We recommend an amendment of the status of the population to “Critically Endangered” on the IUCN Red List.
Van Bressem, Marie-Françoise,Minton, Gianna,Collins, Tim,Willson, Andrew,Baldwin, Robert,Van Waerebeek, Koen
Tattoo-like skin disease in the endangered subpopulation of the Humpback Whale, Journal Article
In: Zoology in the Middle East, no. 489, pp. 1-8, 2014, ISBN: 0939-7140.
Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: Arabian Sea, health, Humpback Whale, lesions, megaptera novaeangliae, Oman, photo-ID, skin, tattoo, Threats
@article{,
title = {Tattoo-like skin disease in the endangered subpopulation of the Humpback Whale, },
author = {Van Bressem, Marie-Françoise,Minton, Gianna,Collins, Tim,Willson, Andrew,Baldwin, Robert,Van Waerebeek, Koen},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09397140.2014.994316},
issn = {0939-7140},
year = {2014},
date = {2014-01-01},
journal = {Zoology in the Middle East},
number = {489},
pages = {1-8},
publisher = {Taylor & Francis},
abstract = {The presence of tattoo-like skin disease is reported in an endangered, non-migratory subpopulation of Humpback Whales (Megaptera novaeangliae) from Oman. We examined 522 images taken during small-boat surveys in the Gulf of Masirah and in Dhofar in 2000-2006 and in 2010-2011. Tattoo-like lesions were detected in regular, good and outstanding images. They appeared as irregular or rounded, light grey marks often showing a whitish outline, and were located on the flanks, dorsum, dorsal fin and caudal peduncle. They could be relatively small to very large and cover up to an estimated 40% of the visible body surface. Over the whole study period disease prevalence reached 21.7% in 60 whales and 16.7% in 36 adults. In this category, prevalence was higher in males (26.7%, N=15) than in females (9.1%, N=11), but the difference was not significant. Lesions appeared larger in males than in the positive female and progressed in two males. Disease prevalence increased significantly from 2000 through 2011 (r2 =0.998). Advanced tattoo skin disease, with lesions extending over more than 10% of the visible body surface seemed to occur more frequently in 2010-2011 than in 2000-2006, but samples were small. This is the first confirmed report of tattoo-like disease in the Balaenopteridae family and the first time it is documented in the Arabian Sea. The disease high prevalence, its increase over time and its progression in some individuals are of concern.},
keywords = {Arabian Sea, health, Humpback Whale, lesions, megaptera novaeangliae, Oman, photo-ID, skin, tattoo, Threats},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Baldwin, R.,Collins, T.J.Q.,Minton, G.,Willson, A.,Corkeron, P.
Arabian Sea humpback whales 2011 update: resights, bubble feeding and hotspots Journal Article
In: Document presented to the Scientific Committee of the International Whaling Commission, vol. SC/54/O4, no. 23, pp. 5, 2011.
Abstract | BibTeX | Tags: Arabian Sea, blue whales, breeding, feeding, Humpback Whale, megaptera novaeangliae, photo identification, sperm whales
@article{,
title = {Arabian Sea humpback whales 2011 update: resights, bubble feeding and hotspots},
author = {Baldwin, R.,Collins, T.J.Q.,Minton, G.,Willson, A.,Corkeron, P.},
year = {2011},
date = {2011-01-01},
journal = {Document presented to the Scientific Committee of the International Whaling Commission},
volume = {SC/54/O4},
number = {23},
pages = {5},
abstract = {The 2010 report of the Scientific Committee (IWC/62/Rep 1) expressed grave concern for the resident ‘Arabian
Sea humpback whale population’. The Committee made strong recommendations for additional research to
monitor the status of this Endangered population which has a restricted range, is reproductively isolated, has a
very small population size (n=82 (95% CI=60-111)) and is known to interact with humans with negative
consequences. A survey during March 2011 resulted in 47 sightings of humpback whales representing
approximately12 individuals. Sightings included a mother-calf pair, observation of competitive behaviour and
frequent feeding including use of ‘bubble cloud’ and ‘bubble net’ structures, all of which have been rarely
witnessed in Oman on previous surveys. At least three known individuals were identified, among them those that
have been re-sighted as many as four times previously and those that have been previously photographed at the
same location. Song was recorded on numerous occasions from the survey vessel and one Cornell MARU was
deployed resulting in acquisition of over 20 days of continuous recordings which are undergoing analysis.
Threats from fishing activity, coastal development and vessel traffic were documented, and an apparent attack on
a humpback whale by false killer whales was witnessed. Numerous other cetacean species were recorded,
including other large whales (blue whales, Bryde’s whales and sperm whales – all with calves – and numerous
small cetaceans). The majority of sightings were clustered around Ras Hasik and all feeding behaviour, including
that by humpback, blue and Bryde’s whales occurred within 2-3 kilometers of this apparent ‘hotspot’. Further
research is recommended which may be best determined via the Conservation Management Planning process.},
keywords = {Arabian Sea, blue whales, breeding, feeding, Humpback Whale, megaptera novaeangliae, photo identification, sperm whales},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Sea humpback whale population’. The Committee made strong recommendations for additional research to
monitor the status of this Endangered population which has a restricted range, is reproductively isolated, has a
very small population size (n=82 (95% CI=60-111)) and is known to interact with humans with negative
consequences. A survey during March 2011 resulted in 47 sightings of humpback whales representing
approximately12 individuals. Sightings included a mother-calf pair, observation of competitive behaviour and
frequent feeding including use of ‘bubble cloud’ and ‘bubble net’ structures, all of which have been rarely
witnessed in Oman on previous surveys. At least three known individuals were identified, among them those that
have been re-sighted as many as four times previously and those that have been previously photographed at the
same location. Song was recorded on numerous occasions from the survey vessel and one Cornell MARU was
deployed resulting in acquisition of over 20 days of continuous recordings which are undergoing analysis.
Threats from fishing activity, coastal development and vessel traffic were documented, and an apparent attack on
a humpback whale by false killer whales was witnessed. Numerous other cetacean species were recorded,
including other large whales (blue whales, Bryde’s whales and sperm whales – all with calves – and numerous
small cetaceans). The majority of sightings were clustered around Ras Hasik and all feeding behaviour, including
that by humpback, blue and Bryde’s whales occurred within 2-3 kilometers of this apparent ‘hotspot’. Further
research is recommended which may be best determined via the Conservation Management Planning process.
Corkeron, Peter J,Collins, Gianna Minton Tim,Findlay, Ken,Willson, Andrew,Baldwin, Robert
Spatial models of sparse data to inform cetacean conservation planning: an example from Oman Journal Article
In: Endangered Species Research, vol. 15, no. 353, pp. 39-52, 2011, ISBN: 1863-5407.
Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: Arabian Sea, cetaceans, Distribution, General linear model, habitat modelling, habitat use, Humpback Whale, megaptera novaeangliae, Oman, Spatial autocorrelation
@article{,
title = {Spatial models of sparse data to inform cetacean conservation planning: an example from Oman},
author = {Corkeron, Peter J,Collins, Gianna Minton Tim,Findlay, Ken,Willson, Andrew,Baldwin, Robert},
url = {https://www.int-res.com/articles/esr_oa/n015p039.pdf},
issn = {1863-5407},
year = {2011},
date = {2011-01-01},
journal = {Endangered Species Research},
volume = {15},
number = {353},
pages = {39-52},
abstract = {Habitat models are tools for understanding the relationship between cetaceans and their
environment, from which patterns of the animals’ space use can be inferred and management strategies
developed. Can working with space use alone be sufficient for management, when habitat cannot
be modeled? Here, we analyzed cetacean sightings data collected from small boat surveys off the
coast of Oman between 2000 and 2003. The waters off Oman are used by the Endangered Arabian
Sea population of humpback whales. Our data were collected primarily for photo-identification, using
a haphazard sampling regime, either in areas where humpback whales were thought to be relatively
abundant, or in areas that were logistically easy to survey. This leads to spatially autocorrelated data
that are not amenable to analysis using standard approaches. We used quasi-Poisson generalized linear
models and semi-parametric spatial filtering to assess the distribution of humpback and Bryde’s
whales in 3 areas off Oman relative to 3 simple physiographic variables in a survey grid. Our analysis
focused on the spatial eigenvector filtering of models, coupled with the spatial distribution of model
residuals, rather than just on model predictions. Spatial eigenvector filtering accounts for spatial
autocorrelation in models, allowing inference to be made regarding the relative importance of particular
areas. As an exemplar of this approach, we demonstrate that the Dhofar coast of southern Oman
is important habitat for the Arabian Sea population of humpback whales. We also suggest how conservation
planning for mitigating impacts on humpback whales off the Dhofar coast could start.},
keywords = {Arabian Sea, cetaceans, Distribution, General linear model, habitat modelling, habitat use, Humpback Whale, megaptera novaeangliae, Oman, Spatial autocorrelation},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
environment, from which patterns of the animals’ space use can be inferred and management strategies
developed. Can working with space use alone be sufficient for management, when habitat cannot
be modeled? Here, we analyzed cetacean sightings data collected from small boat surveys off the
coast of Oman between 2000 and 2003. The waters off Oman are used by the Endangered Arabian
Sea population of humpback whales. Our data were collected primarily for photo-identification, using
a haphazard sampling regime, either in areas where humpback whales were thought to be relatively
abundant, or in areas that were logistically easy to survey. This leads to spatially autocorrelated data
that are not amenable to analysis using standard approaches. We used quasi-Poisson generalized linear
models and semi-parametric spatial filtering to assess the distribution of humpback and Bryde’s
whales in 3 areas off Oman relative to 3 simple physiographic variables in a survey grid. Our analysis
focused on the spatial eigenvector filtering of models, coupled with the spatial distribution of model
residuals, rather than just on model predictions. Spatial eigenvector filtering accounts for spatial
autocorrelation in models, allowing inference to be made regarding the relative importance of particular
areas. As an exemplar of this approach, we demonstrate that the Dhofar coast of southern Oman
is important habitat for the Arabian Sea population of humpback whales. We also suggest how conservation
planning for mitigating impacts on humpback whales off the Dhofar coast could start.
Minton,G.,Collins,T.J.Q.,Findlay,K.P.,Ersts,P.J.,Rosenbaum,H.C.,Berggren,P.,Baldwin,R.M.
Seasonal distribution, abundance, habitat use and population identity of humpback whales in Oman Journal Article
In: Journal of Cetacean Research and Management, vol. Special Issue on Southern Hemisphere Hum, no. 415, pp. 185–198, 2011.
Abstract | BibTeX | Tags: Distribution, Humpback Whale, humpback whales, Oman, population, population characteristics, whale, whales
@article{,
title = {Seasonal distribution, abundance, habitat use and population identity of humpback whales in Oman},
author = {Minton,G.,Collins,T.J.Q.,Findlay,K.P.,Ersts,P.J.,Rosenbaum,H.C.,Berggren,P.,Baldwin,R.M.},
year = {2011},
date = {2011-01-01},
journal = {Journal of Cetacean Research and Management},
volume = {Special Issue on Southern Hemisphere Hum},
number = {415},
pages = {185–198},
abstract = {Published data on the occurrence of humpback whales (Megaptera novaeangliae) in the Arabian Sea suggest that the region hosts a non-migratory population that adheres to a Northern Hemisphere breeding cycle. Twelve small boat surveys were conducted at three main locations off the coast of Oman between February 2000 and November 2004 to investigate the distribution and seasonal abundance of humpback whales and other cetaceans.
An even ratio of males and females were observed and sampled during surveys in the Gulf of Masirah (Gulf of Masirah) in October and November (n=38), while almost all whales sampled in Dhofar in February/March were male (n=28). Song was detected frequently in the bay surrounding the Halaniyat Islands (formerly known as the Kuria Muria Bay) in February/March, but observations of mother-calf pairs were sparse, and competitive groups were absent. Feeding was observed in both October/November and February/March, but behavioural and environmental observations indicate that the Gulf of Masirah is primarily an important feeding ground, while the Dhofar region, particularly the Halaniyat Bay, may be a breeding area. However, a lack of recent observations of both mother-calf pairs and competitive groups raises the possibility that the primary mating, calving and nursing areas are yet to be identified.
Of the 64 whales that have been identified using photographs of dorsal fins or tail flukes, six individuals have been observed on at least two surveys, four individuals on three surveys, one on four surveys and one on five separate surveys. Identified individuals were re-sighted in both the Gulf of Masirah and Dhofar at different times of the year and across survey years, indicating year-round residence off the coast of Oman.
A Chapman's modified Petersen estimator was applied to various data pairings to calculate abundance. All pairings yielded estimates of less than 100 individuals, but sample sizes are small and there are various sources of possible bias. Analysis of scarring on the caudal peduncle region of identified individuals in Oman indicates that between 30 and 40% are likely to have been involved in entanglements with fishing gear.
Comparison of the Oman photo-identification catalogue with those from Zanzibar, Antongil Bay (Madagascar) and Mayotte and the Geyser Atoll (Comoros Archipelago), yielded no photographic matches. These data are consistent with the hypothesis of a discrete population. The distribution of fluke pigmentation rankings from the Oman catalogue, which varied significantly from those of Madagascar and Mayotte, provides further evidence for this theory.},
keywords = {Distribution, Humpback Whale, humpback whales, Oman, population, population characteristics, whale, whales},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
An even ratio of males and females were observed and sampled during surveys in the Gulf of Masirah (Gulf of Masirah) in October and November (n=38), while almost all whales sampled in Dhofar in February/March were male (n=28). Song was detected frequently in the bay surrounding the Halaniyat Islands (formerly known as the Kuria Muria Bay) in February/March, but observations of mother-calf pairs were sparse, and competitive groups were absent. Feeding was observed in both October/November and February/March, but behavioural and environmental observations indicate that the Gulf of Masirah is primarily an important feeding ground, while the Dhofar region, particularly the Halaniyat Bay, may be a breeding area. However, a lack of recent observations of both mother-calf pairs and competitive groups raises the possibility that the primary mating, calving and nursing areas are yet to be identified.
Of the 64 whales that have been identified using photographs of dorsal fins or tail flukes, six individuals have been observed on at least two surveys, four individuals on three surveys, one on four surveys and one on five separate surveys. Identified individuals were re-sighted in both the Gulf of Masirah and Dhofar at different times of the year and across survey years, indicating year-round residence off the coast of Oman.
A Chapman's modified Petersen estimator was applied to various data pairings to calculate abundance. All pairings yielded estimates of less than 100 individuals, but sample sizes are small and there are various sources of possible bias. Analysis of scarring on the caudal peduncle region of identified individuals in Oman indicates that between 30 and 40% are likely to have been involved in entanglements with fishing gear.
Comparison of the Oman photo-identification catalogue with those from Zanzibar, Antongil Bay (Madagascar) and Mayotte and the Geyser Atoll (Comoros Archipelago), yielded no photographic matches. These data are consistent with the hypothesis of a discrete population. The distribution of fluke pigmentation rankings from the Oman catalogue, which varied significantly from those of Madagascar and Mayotte, provides further evidence for this theory.
Stewart, J. R.,Aspinall, S.,Beech, M.,Fenberg, P.,Hellyer, P.,Larkin, N.,Lokier, S. W.,Marx, F. G.,Meyer, M.,Miller, R.,Rainbow, P. S.,Taylor, J. D.,Whittaker, J. E.,Al-Mehsin, K.,Strohmenger, C. J.
In: Quaternary Science Reviews, vol. 30, no. 238, pp. 3675-3690, 2011, ISBN: 0277-3791.
Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: Arabian Gulf, Arabian Sea, Humpback Whale, megaptera novaeangliae, United Arab Emirates
@article{,
title = {Biotically constrained palaeoenvironmental conditions of a mid-Holocene intertidal lagoon on the southern shore of the Arabian Gulf: evidence associated with a whale skeleton at Musaffah, Abu Dhabi, UAE},
author = {Stewart, J. R.,Aspinall, S.,Beech, M.,Fenberg, P.,Hellyer, P.,Larkin, N.,Lokier, S. W.,Marx, F. G.,Meyer, M.,Miller, R.,Rainbow, P. S.,Taylor, J. D.,Whittaker, J. E.,Al-Mehsin, K.,Strohmenger, C. J.},
url = {http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277379111002836},
issn = {0277-3791},
year = {2011},
date = {2011-01-01},
journal = {Quaternary Science Reviews},
volume = {30},
number = {238},
pages = {3675-3690},
abstract = {Whale remains (a left and right mandible, scapula, humerus and fragmentary radius and ulna as well as parts of the cranium and rostrum) belonging to a probable humpback whale (Megaptera cf. novaeangliae) were found in the well-described sabkha sequence exposed in the Musaffah Industrial Channel, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates. More precisely, the whale remains were found in a series of sediments representing a range of lagoonal facies. The sediments surrounding the whale bones were age-dated at approximately 5200 14C yrsBP and are therefore interpreted to correspond to the previously documented late Flandrian sea-level peak, preceding a fall in sea-level which culminated in the supratidal sabkha overprint of the carbonates. Associated with the whale remains is an assemblage of molluscs, foraminifera and ostracods. Together with the inferred presence of sea grass and algae, these facies are interpreted to indicate a very shallow subtidal to intertidal lagoonal environment. Cirripede remains found associated with the skeleton were identified as those of the whale barnacle Coronula diadema and hence had their origins with the whale. Significantly, the low species diversity of microfossils suggests that higher salinities existed in the mid-Holocene lagoon than are present in modern counterparts. This is here inferred to be related to the onset of continental aridity in Arabia during the mid-Holocene.},
keywords = {Arabian Gulf, Arabian Sea, Humpback Whale, megaptera novaeangliae, United Arab Emirates},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Baldwin, R.,Collins, T.,Minton, G.,Findlay, K.,Corkeron, P.,Willson, A.,Van Bressem, M.F.
Arabian Sea Humpback Whales: Canaries for the Northern Indian Ocean? Journal Article
In: Document presented to the 62nd meeting of the Scientific Committee of the International Whaling Commission. SC/62/SH20, no. 305, pp. 1-5, 2010.
Abstract | BibTeX | Tags: Arabian Sea, Humpback Whale, megaptera novaeangliae, mitigation, Oman, Threats
@article{,
title = {Arabian Sea Humpback Whales: Canaries for the Northern Indian Ocean?},
author = {Baldwin, R.,Collins, T.,Minton, G.,Findlay, K.,Corkeron, P.,Willson, A.,Van Bressem, M.F.},
year = {2010},
date = {2010-01-01},
journal = {Document presented to the 62nd meeting of the Scientific Committee of the International Whaling Commission. SC/62/SH20},
number = {305},
pages = {1-5},
abstract = {Both historic whaling data and recent field research confirm the presence of a resident sub-population of humpback whales in the western Arabian Sea (Breeding Stock X). This endangered population is geographically, demographically and genetically isolated and is thought to have been greatly reduced in size by Soviet whaling in 1966; it likely remains severely depleted. Current threats to this population, including incidental capture in fishing gear, coastal development and hydrocarbon exploration have increased in recent years and, coupled with possible underlying health issues, raise significant concerns about this population’s viability. When compared with effort and resources aimed at other whale stocks, Breeding Stock X receives disproportionately meagre support for its research and conservation, whilst its status, health and the precautionary principle, imply that it merits at least the same level of concern.},
keywords = {Arabian Sea, Humpback Whale, megaptera novaeangliae, mitigation, Oman, Threats},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Braulik,G.,Ranjbar,S.,Owfi,F.,Aminrad,T.,Dakhteh,S.M.H.,Kamrani,E.,Mohsenizadeh,F.
Marine Mammal Records from Iran Journal Article
In: Journal of Cetacean Research and Management, vol. 11, no. 334, pp. 49-63, 2010.
Abstract | BibTeX | Tags: abundance, bottlenose dolphin, Bryde's whale, Common dolphin, conservation, Distribution, dolphin, dugong, fin whale, Finless Porpoise, fishing gear, Gulf of Oman, Humpback Whale, humpback whales, incidental capture, killer whale, location, mammals, management, marine, marine mammal, Marine mammals, mortality, mysticete, mysticetes, Oman, Porpoise, Risso's dolphin, rough-toothed dolphin, Spinner dolphin, whale, whales
@article{,
title = {Marine Mammal Records from Iran},
author = {Braulik,G.,Ranjbar,S.,Owfi,F.,Aminrad,T.,Dakhteh,S.M.H.,Kamrani,E.,Mohsenizadeh,F.},
year = {2010},
date = {2010-01-01},
journal = {Journal of Cetacean Research and Management},
volume = {11},
number = {334},
pages = {49-63},
abstract = {A total of 114 marine mammal records of 14 species were compiled from Iranian coastalwaters of the Persian Gulf and Gulf of Oman. Eighty-one were from the Persian Gulf, 23from the Gulf of Oman and 10 were of unknown location. Records of finless porpoise(Neophocaena phocaenoides) (24), Indo-pacific humpback dolphin (Sousa chinensis) (22)and Indo-pacific bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops aduncus) (21) were by far the most numerousa probable reflection of their inshore distribution and local abundance. Other speciesrecorded were common dolphin (Delphinus capensis tropicalis), rough-toothed dolphin(Steno bredanensis), striped dolphin (Stenella coeruleoalba), spinner dolphin (Stenellalongirostris), Risso's dolphin (Grampus griseus), false killer whale (Pseudorca crassidens),sperm whale (Physeter macrocephalus) and dugong (Dugong dugon). Records of 24Mysticetes were compiled, 11 of which were tentatively identified as Bryde's whales(Balaenoptera edeni), three as Fin whales (Balaenoptera physalus), three as Humpbackwhales (Megaptera novaeangliae) and the remainder were unidentified. The largest threat tomarine mammals in Iran is likely to be incidental capture in fishing gear. Nine finlessporpoises were recorded as bycatch and this and other coastal species may be declining dueto unsustainable mortality rates. Other threats to the marine environment are discussed andrecommended marine mammal conservation and management small projects are described.},
keywords = {abundance, bottlenose dolphin, Bryde's whale, Common dolphin, conservation, Distribution, dolphin, dugong, fin whale, Finless Porpoise, fishing gear, Gulf of Oman, Humpback Whale, humpback whales, incidental capture, killer whale, location, mammals, management, marine, marine mammal, Marine mammals, mortality, mysticete, mysticetes, Oman, Porpoise, Risso's dolphin, rough-toothed dolphin, Spinner dolphin, whale, whales},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Gheilani, H.M.,Jayabalan, N.
Sighting of Whales and Dolphins in the Arabian Sea off Oman during 2007-2008 Journal Article
In: Environment and Ecology, vol. 28, no. 378, pp. 2768—2776, 2010.
Abstract | BibTeX | Tags: Arabian Sea, Common dolphin, Distribution, Gulf of Oman, Humpback Whale, Oman, Orca, Spinner dolphin
@article{,
title = {Sighting of Whales and Dolphins in the Arabian Sea off Oman during 2007-2008},
author = {Gheilani, H.M.,Jayabalan, N.},
year = {2010},
date = {2010-01-01},
journal = {Environment and Ecology},
volume = {28},
number = {378},
pages = {2768—2776},
abstract = {During the fishery survey cruises of R. V. Al Mustaqila 1 conducted in the Arabian Sea EEZ of Oman
between September 2007 and September 2008, three species of whales such as humpback whale (Megaptera
novaeagliae), sperm whale (Physeter macrocephalus) and killer whale (Orcinus orca) and, two species of
dolphins, namely the long-beaked common dolphin (Delphinus delphis) and spinner dolphin (Stenella
longirostris) were recorded along with few unidentified whales and dolphins. Most whale sightings (85%)
were recorded between Ras al Hadd to Ras Madrakah at depths ranging from 20 m to 200 m during April,
May, September—November usually with 1—6 individuals. The seasons of sighting of dolphins were during
February and May (17 sightinga) and September and November (11 sightings) between Ras al Hadd and Ras
Soqarah and 70% of the sightings recorded less than 100 individuals. While the temperature of the water in
the survey ranged from 18.4 C to 24.7 C, there was less variation in salinity (35.68, 36.62 ppt) of the
water. The current study indicated that the Arabian Sea off Oman is an important site for the distribution
of the ceatacean fauna.},
keywords = {Arabian Sea, Common dolphin, Distribution, Gulf of Oman, Humpback Whale, Oman, Orca, Spinner dolphin},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
between September 2007 and September 2008, three species of whales such as humpback whale (Megaptera
novaeagliae), sperm whale (Physeter macrocephalus) and killer whale (Orcinus orca) and, two species of
dolphins, namely the long-beaked common dolphin (Delphinus delphis) and spinner dolphin (Stenella
longirostris) were recorded along with few unidentified whales and dolphins. Most whale sightings (85%)
were recorded between Ras al Hadd to Ras Madrakah at depths ranging from 20 m to 200 m during April,
May, September—November usually with 1—6 individuals. The seasons of sighting of dolphins were during
February and May (17 sightinga) and September and November (11 sightings) between Ras al Hadd and Ras
Soqarah and 70% of the sightings recorded less than 100 individuals. While the temperature of the water in
the survey ranged from 18.4 C to 24.7 C, there was less variation in salinity (35.68, 36.62 ppt) of the
water. The current study indicated that the Arabian Sea off Oman is an important site for the distribution
of the ceatacean fauna.
Minton,G.,Cherchio, S.,Collins,T.J.Q.,Ersts, P.J.,Findlay,K.P.,Pomilla, C.,Bennett, D.,Meyer, M.,Razafindrakoto, Y.,Kotze, D.,Oosthuizen, H.,Leslie, M.,Andrianarivelo, N.,Baldwin,R.M.,Ponnampalam, L.,Rosenbaum, H.C.
A note on the comparison of humpback whale tail fluke catalogues from the Sultanate of Oman with Madagascar and the East African Mainland Journal Article
In: Journal of Cetacean Research and Management, vol. 11, no. 408, pp. 65-68, 2010.
Abstract | BibTeX | Tags: Arabian Sea, Humpback Whale, humpback whales, Indian Ocean, Madagascar, megaptera novaeangliae, Mozambique, Northern Hemisphere, Oman, photo-ID, population identity, South Africa
@article{,
title = {A note on the comparison of humpback whale tail fluke catalogues from the Sultanate of Oman with Madagascar and the East African Mainland},
author = {Minton,G.,Cherchio, S.,Collins,T.J.Q.,Ersts, P.J.,Findlay,K.P.,Pomilla, C.,Bennett, D.,Meyer, M.,Razafindrakoto, Y.,Kotze, D.,Oosthuizen, H.,Leslie, M.,Andrianarivelo, N.,Baldwin,R.M.,Ponnampalam, L.,Rosenbaum, H.C.},
year = {2010},
date = {2010-01-01},
journal = {Journal of Cetacean Research and Management},
volume = {11},
number = {408},
pages = {65-68},
abstract = {The photo-identification catalogue of humpback whale tail flukes from Oman was compared with those from Antongil Bay, Madagascar and study
sites in South Africa and Mozambique collectively termed the ‘East African Mainland’. No matches were found, supporting other lines of evidence
that the humpback whales studied off the coast of Oman form part of a discrete Arabian Sea population, which adheres to a Northern Hemisphere
breeding cycle, and has little or no ongoing exchange with the nearest neighbouring populations in the southern Indian Ocean.While the sample size
from Oman is small, and low levels of ongoing exchange might not be detected in this type of catalogue comparison, the study nonetheless emphasises
the need to pursue research and conservation efforts in the known and suspected range of the Endangered Arabian Sea humpback whale population.},
keywords = {Arabian Sea, Humpback Whale, humpback whales, Indian Ocean, Madagascar, megaptera novaeangliae, Mozambique, Northern Hemisphere, Oman, photo-ID, population identity, South Africa},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
sites in South Africa and Mozambique collectively termed the ‘East African Mainland’. No matches were found, supporting other lines of evidence
that the humpback whales studied off the coast of Oman form part of a discrete Arabian Sea population, which adheres to a Northern Hemisphere
breeding cycle, and has little or no ongoing exchange with the nearest neighbouring populations in the southern Indian Ocean.While the sample size
from Oman is small, and low levels of ongoing exchange might not be detected in this type of catalogue comparison, the study nonetheless emphasises
the need to pursue research and conservation efforts in the known and suspected range of the Endangered Arabian Sea humpback whale population.
Clapham, P.J.,Ivashcenko, Y.V.
A whale of a deception Journal Article
In: Marine Fisheries Review, vol. 71, no. 347, pp. 44-52, 2009.
Abstract | BibTeX | Tags: Humpback Whale, IWC, Soviet whaling
@article{,
title = {A whale of a deception},
author = {Clapham, P.J.,Ivashcenko, Y.V.},
year = {2009},
date = {2009-01-01},
journal = {Marine Fisheries Review},
volume = {71},
number = {347},
pages = {44-52},
abstract = {A whaling fleet engaged in the practice
of whaling is hardly cause for comment.
What made these catches unusual,
however, was that almost all of them
were illegal.
Over the next two weeks, the vessels
of the Soviet fleet swept the northwestern
Indian Ocean. Their search for
whales took them from Oman to the
Gulf of Kutch off Pakistan, through
offshore waters west of the Indian city
of Bombay, and south to the Maldive
Islands. By the time Sovetskaya Ukraina
finally resumed her course for the Antarctic
on November 21st, her catcher
boats had delivered more than three
hundred whales to the huge floating factory
for processing. Most of the animals
had been either humpbacks, Megaptera
novaeangliae, or blue whales, Balaenoptera
musculus, two species that
were officially considered “protected”
under the international regulations that
governed commercial whaling.
When the Soviet fleet reached the
Antarctic, the pattern was repeated.
Already-depleted and supposedly protected
stocks of whales were plundered
for several months until the onset of the
austral winter. Finally, as the weather
turned increasingly foul, the factory
ship and her catchers began the long
journey home.},
keywords = {Humpback Whale, IWC, Soviet whaling},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
of whaling is hardly cause for comment.
What made these catches unusual,
however, was that almost all of them
were illegal.
Over the next two weeks, the vessels
of the Soviet fleet swept the northwestern
Indian Ocean. Their search for
whales took them from Oman to the
Gulf of Kutch off Pakistan, through
offshore waters west of the Indian city
of Bombay, and south to the Maldive
Islands. By the time Sovetskaya Ukraina
finally resumed her course for the Antarctic
on November 21st, her catcher
boats had delivered more than three
hundred whales to the huge floating factory
for processing. Most of the animals
had been either humpbacks, Megaptera
novaeangliae, or blue whales, Balaenoptera
musculus, two species that
were officially considered “protected”
under the international regulations that
governed commercial whaling.
When the Soviet fleet reached the
Antarctic, the pattern was repeated.
Already-depleted and supposedly protected
stocks of whales were plundered
for several months until the onset of the
austral winter. Finally, as the weather
turned increasingly foul, the factory
ship and her catchers began the long
journey home.
Rosenbaum, H.C.,Pomilla, C.,Mendez, M.C.,Leslie, M.,Best, P.,Findlay, K.,Minton, G.,Ersts, P.J.,Collins, T.,Engel, M.H.,Bonatto, S.,Kotze, D.,Meyer, M.,Barendse, J.,Thornton, M.,Razafindrakoto, Y.,Ngouessono, S,Vely, M.,Kiszka, J.
Population Structure of Humpback Whales from Their Breeding Grounds in the South Atlantic and Indian Oceans Journal Article
In: PLoS ONE, vol. 4, no. 460, pp. e7318. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0007318, 2009.
Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: Arabian Sea, Humpback Whale, Indian Ocean, megaptera novaeangliae, migration, mtDNA, Oman, population identity, population structure, Population X, Southern Hemisphere
@article{,
title = {Population Structure of Humpback Whales from Their Breeding Grounds in the South Atlantic and Indian Oceans},
author = {Rosenbaum, H.C.,Pomilla, C.,Mendez, M.C.,Leslie, M.,Best, P.,Findlay, K.,Minton, G.,Ersts, P.J.,Collins, T.,Engel, M.H.,Bonatto, S.,Kotze, D.,Meyer, M.,Barendse, J.,Thornton, M.,Razafindrakoto, Y.,Ngouessono, S,Vely, M.,Kiszka, J.},
url = {https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0007318},
year = {2009},
date = {2009-01-01},
journal = {PLoS ONE},
volume = {4},
number = {460},
pages = {e7318. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0007318},
abstract = {Although humpback whales are among the best-studied of the large whales, population boundaries in the Southern
Hemisphere (SH) have remained largely untested. We assess population structure of SH humpback whales using 1,527
samples collected from whales at fourteen sampling sites within the Southwestern and Southeastern Atlantic, the
Southwestern Indian Ocean, and Northern Indian Ocean (Breeding Stocks A, B, C and X, respectively). Evaluation of mtDNA
population structure and migration rates was carried out under different statistical frameworks. Using all genetic evidence,
the results suggest significant degrees of population structure between all ocean basins, with the Southwestern and
Northern Indian Ocean most differentiated from each other. Effective migration rates were highest between the
Southeastern Atlantic and the Southwestern Indian Ocean, followed by rates within the Southeastern Atlantic, and the
lowest between the Southwestern and Northern Indian Ocean. At finer scales, very low gene flow was detected between
the two neighbouring sub-regions in the Southeastern Atlantic, compared to high gene flow for whales within the
Southwestern Indian Ocean. Our genetic results support the current management designations proposed by the
International Whaling Commission of Breeding Stocks A, B, C, and X as four strongly structured populations. The population
structure patterns found in this study are likely to have been influenced by a combination of long-term maternally directed
fidelity of migratory destinations, along with other ecological and oceanographic features in the region.},
keywords = {Arabian Sea, Humpback Whale, Indian Ocean, megaptera novaeangliae, migration, mtDNA, Oman, population identity, population structure, Population X, Southern Hemisphere},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Hemisphere (SH) have remained largely untested. We assess population structure of SH humpback whales using 1,527
samples collected from whales at fourteen sampling sites within the Southwestern and Southeastern Atlantic, the
Southwestern Indian Ocean, and Northern Indian Ocean (Breeding Stocks A, B, C and X, respectively). Evaluation of mtDNA
population structure and migration rates was carried out under different statistical frameworks. Using all genetic evidence,
the results suggest significant degrees of population structure between all ocean basins, with the Southwestern and
Northern Indian Ocean most differentiated from each other. Effective migration rates were highest between the
Southeastern Atlantic and the Southwestern Indian Ocean, followed by rates within the Southeastern Atlantic, and the
lowest between the Southwestern and Northern Indian Ocean. At finer scales, very low gene flow was detected between
the two neighbouring sub-regions in the Southeastern Atlantic, compared to high gene flow for whales within the
Southwestern Indian Ocean. Our genetic results support the current management designations proposed by the
International Whaling Commission of Breeding Stocks A, B, C, and X as four strongly structured populations. The population
structure patterns found in this study are likely to have been influenced by a combination of long-term maternally directed
fidelity of migratory destinations, along with other ecological and oceanographic features in the region.
Minton,G.,Collins,T.J.Q.,Pomilla,C.,Findlay,K.P.,Rosenbaum,H.C.,Baldwin,R,Brownell Jr,R.L.
Megaptera novaeangliae Journal Article
In: IUCN Red List of Threatened Species, vol. http://www.iucnredlist.org/details/13283, no. 416, 2008.
Abstract | BibTeX | Tags: Arabian Sea, conservation, endangered, Humpback Whale, megaptera novaeangliae, Oman, whale
@article{,
title = {Megaptera novaeangliae},
author = {Minton,G.,Collins,T.J.Q.,Pomilla,C.,Findlay,K.P.,Rosenbaum,H.C.,Baldwin,R,Brownell Jr,R.L.},
year = {2008},
date = {2008-01-01},
journal = {IUCN Red List of Threatened Species},
volume = {http://www.iucnredlist.org/details/13283},
number = {416},
abstract = {This subpopulation is geographically, demographically and genetically isolated, with a unique year-round residency in sub-tropical waters of the Arabian Sea. The original size of the subpopulation is unknown. However, the current abundance estimate off the coast of Oman, based on photo-identification, while potentially an underestimate, is 82 animals (95% CI 60-111). The basis for an Endangered listing is that the subpopulation is geographically distinct and plausibly contains fewer than 250 mature individuals. According to Taylor et al. (2007) a total abundance of just over 400 individuals would be required in order for the proportion of mature individuals (62%) to reach 250. Even if the Arabian Sea humpback whale population estimate were biased downward, it is highly unlikely that the total abundance would exceed 400.},
keywords = {Arabian Sea, conservation, endangered, Humpback Whale, megaptera novaeangliae, Oman, whale},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
IWC
Report of the workshop on the comprehensive assessment of Southern Hemisphere humpback whales Technical Report
no. 392, 2006.
Abstract | BibTeX | Tags: abundance, Arabian Sea, Australia, Distribution, Humpback Whale, humpback whales, Indian Ocean, Movements, Oman, population, populations, Southern Hemisphere, survey, whale, whales, whaling
@techreport{,
title = {Report of the workshop on the comprehensive assessment of Southern Hemisphere humpback whales},
author = {IWC},
year = {2006},
date = {2006-01-01},
journal = {Report presented to the 58th meeting of the International Whaling Commission},
volume = {SC/58/Rep5},
number = {392},
pages = {1-77},
abstract = {This report summarises all the data for SH humpback whales. Specific recommendations for Pop X (Arabian Sea/Oman) include: Given that the humpback whales of Region X represent an isolated population that has a very low estimate ofabundance, it is strongly recommended that further research be undertaken that will aid in protection of thisstock.There are whales in unsampled areas between Oman and other study areas in Africa and Western Australia. TheWorkshop recommended that studies should be conducted in these areas.It was recommended that further genetic sampling and analysis be completed to more conclusively determinethe degree of differentiation for humpback whales of Region X and the timing of its separation from otherhumpback whale populations.Distribution of whales in Region X clearly occurs throughout areas of the Arabian Sea but surveys conducted todate have been limited to the coast of Oman. The Workshop encourages more survey effort in other areas toevaluate movements and relationships with whales off the coast of Oman.Given the seasonal limitations in survey effort and an unresolved degree of movement and connectivity withother concentrations of humpback whales in the Indian Ocean, the Workshop suggests that satellite telemetrystudies be initiated.},
keywords = {abundance, Arabian Sea, Australia, Distribution, Humpback Whale, humpback whales, Indian Ocean, Movements, Oman, population, populations, Southern Hemisphere, survey, whale, whales, whaling},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {techreport}
}
Minton,G.,Collins,T.J.Q.,Findlay,K.P.,Baldwin,R,Ersts,P.J.,Rosenbaum,H.C.
Seasonal distribution and population characteristics of humpback whales in Oman Technical Report
no. 413, 2006, ISBN: SC/A06/HW48.
Abstract | BibTeX | Tags: Australia, cetacean, Distribution, habitat, habitat preference, habitat preferences, Humpback Whale, humpback whales, Oman, population, population characteristics, Southern Hemisphere, whale, whales
@techreport{,
title = {Seasonal distribution and population characteristics of humpback whales in Oman},
author = {Minton,G.,Collins,T.J.Q.,Findlay,K.P.,Baldwin,R,Ersts,P.J.,Rosenbaum,H.C.},
issn = {SC/A06/HW48},
year = {2006},
date = {2006-01-01},
journal = {Document presented to the Workshop on the Comprehensive Assessment of Southern Hemisphere Humpback Whales, Hobart, Australia, April 2006},
volume = {SC/A06/HW48},
number = {413},
pages = {1-48},
abstract = {Previously published data on the occurrence of humpback whales (Megaptera novaeangliae) in the Arabian Sea suggest that the region hosts a non-migratory population that adheres to a Northern Hemisphere breeding cycle. Twelve small boat surveys were conducted at three main locations off the coast of Oman between February 2000 and November 2004 to investigate the distribution and seasonal abundance of humpback whales and other cetaceans. An even ratio of males and females were observed and sampled during surveys in the Gulf of Masirah in October and November (n=38), while almost all whales sampled in Dhofar February/March were male (n=28). Song was detected frequently in the Kuria Muria Bay in February/March, but observations of mother-calf pairs were sparse, and competitive groups were absent. Feeding was observed in both October/November and February/March, but behavioural and environmental observations indicate that the Gulf of Masirah is primarily an important feeding ground, while the Dhofar region, particularly the Kuria Muria Bay, appears to be a breeding area. However, a lack of recent observations of both mother-calf pairs and competitive groups raises the possibility that the primary mating, calving and nursing areas are yet to be identified. Of the 64 whales that have been identified using photographs of dorsal fins or tail flukes, six individuals have been observed on at least two surveys, four individuals on three surveys, one on four surveys and one on five separate surveys. Individually identified whales were re-sighted in both the Gulf of Masirah and Dhofar at different times of the year and across survey years, indicating year-round residence off the coast of Oman. A Chapman's modified Petersen estimator was applied to various data pairings to calculate abundance in the areas surveyed. All pairings yielded estimates of less than 100 individuals, but sample sizes were small there are various sources of possible bias. Analysis of scarring on the caudal peduncle region of individually identified whales in Oman indicate that between 30 and 40% of identified whales are likely to have been involved in entanglements with fishing gear. Comparison of the Oman photo-identification catalogue with those from Zanzibar, Antongil Bay (Madagascar) and Mayotte and the Geyser Atoll (Comoros Archipelago), yielded no photographic matches, and support the hypothesis of a discrete population as did comparison of the distribution of fluke pigmentation rankings from the Oman catalogue, which varied significantly from those of Madagascar and Mayotte. In general the data examined in this study suggest that the population or sub-population of humpback whales off the coast of Oman is resident year-round, small and potentially discrete, warranting further research and conservation efforts.},
keywords = {Australia, cetacean, Distribution, habitat, habitat preference, habitat preferences, Humpback Whale, humpback whales, Oman, population, population characteristics, Southern Hemisphere, whale, whales},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {techreport}
}
Rosenbaum,H.C.,Pomilla,C.,Olavarria,C.,Baker,C.S.,Leslie,M.,Mendez,M.C.,Caballero,S.,Brasseur,M,Bannister,J.L,Best,P.B.,Bonatto,S.,Collins,T.J.Q.,Engel,M.H.,Ersts,P.J.,Findlay,K.P.,Florez-Gonzalez,L.,Garrigue,C.,Hauser,N.,Jenner,C.,Meyer,M.,Minton,G.,Poole,M.M.,Razafindrakoto,Y.
A first and preliminary analysis of mtDNA sequences from humpback whales for breeding stocks A-G and X Technical Report
no. 461, 2006, ISBN: SC/A06/HW59.
BibTeX | Tags: Atlantic, Atlantic Ocean, breeding grounds, DNA, dolphin, Humpback Whale, humpback whales, Indian Ocean, mitochondrial DNA, Oman, population, South Atlantic, Southern Hemisphere, stocks, whale, whales
@techreport{,
title = {A first and preliminary analysis of mtDNA sequences from humpback whales for breeding stocks A-G and X},
author = {Rosenbaum,H.C.,Pomilla,C.,Olavarria,C.,Baker,C.S.,Leslie,M.,Mendez,M.C.,Caballero,S.,Brasseur,M,Bannister,J.L,Best,P.B.,Bonatto,S.,Collins,T.J.Q.,Engel,M.H.,Ersts,P.J.,Findlay,K.P.,Florez-Gonzalez,L.,Garrigue,C.,Hauser,N.,Jenner,C.,Meyer,M.,Minton,G.,Poole,M.M.,Razafindrakoto,Y.},
issn = {SC/A06/HW59},
year = {2006},
date = {2006-01-01},
journal = {Report presented to the Comprehensive Assessment of Southern Hemisphere Humpback Whales, Hobart, Tasmania},
volume = {SC/A06/HW59},
number = {461},
keywords = {Atlantic, Atlantic Ocean, breeding grounds, DNA, dolphin, Humpback Whale, humpback whales, Indian Ocean, mitochondrial DNA, Oman, population, South Atlantic, Southern Hemisphere, stocks, whale, whales},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {techreport}
}
Mehta,A.V.
How important are baleen whales as prey for killer whales (Orcinus orca) in high-latitude waters? PhD Thesis
2004.
Abstract | BibTeX | Tags: Alaska, Antarctic, Atlantic, Australia, baleen whales, Blue whale, blue whales, Gulf of Maine, Humpback Whale, humpback whales, killer whale, killer whales, New Caledonia, New Zealand, North Atlantic, North Atlantic right whale, North Pacific, Oman, Orca, Orcinus orca, population, prey, pygmy blue whale, Pygmy blue whales, right whale, right whales, whale, whales, whaling
@phdthesis{,
title = {How important are baleen whales as prey for killer whales (Orcinus orca) in high-latitude waters?},
author = {Mehta,A.V.},
year = {2004},
date = {2004-01-01},
number = {403},
pages = {1-15},
publisher = {Boston University},
abstract = {Data on humpback whales were collected from twenty-one regions: eleven in the North Atlantic and three in the North Pacific, as well as American Samoa, Vava'u (Tonga), New Zealand, New Caledonia, western Australia, the Antarctic Peninsula, and Oman. The other species and subspecies included in this project were sampled from a single population each (Fig. 1): North Atlantic right whales, blue whales off southeastern Australia, and pygmy blue whales (Balaenoptera musculus brevicauda) off western Australia. The proportion of whales in different sampling regions bearing rake marks ranged from 0% to over 40%. The Gulf of Maine population had a scarring rate of 9.9-11%, while SW Alaska had a rate of 21.1 to 21.9%. Oman had a rate of 9.1% (3 of 33 animals). The highest rate of scarring was the "Mexico" population with a scarring rate of over 40%. Of those scarred animals with multi-year sighting histories, 82.8% to 100% had those scars the first time they were sighted. Of the total number of whales sampled from these regions, 0% to only 4.8% acquired new or additional rake marks after their first sighting, supporting the hypothesis that most whales aquire their scars as calves, and that adult baleen whales do not constitute a major prey source for killer whales.Overall, the present study suggests that the hypothesis presented by Springer et al. (2003) - that killer whales in the North Pacific were forced by industrial whaling to switch prey from baleen whales to pinnipeds and sea otters - is untenable.},
keywords = {Alaska, Antarctic, Atlantic, Australia, baleen whales, Blue whale, blue whales, Gulf of Maine, Humpback Whale, humpback whales, killer whale, killer whales, New Caledonia, New Zealand, North Atlantic, North Atlantic right whale, North Pacific, Oman, Orca, Orcinus orca, population, prey, pygmy blue whale, Pygmy blue whales, right whale, right whales, whale, whales, whaling},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {phdthesis}
}
Minton,G.
Ecology and Conservation of Cetaceans in Oman, with particular reference to humpback whales (Megaptera novaeangliae) PhD Thesis
2004.
Abstract | BibTeX | Tags: cetacean, cetaceans, conservation, ecology, Humpback Whale, humpback whales, megaptera novaeangliae, Oman, whale, whales
@phdthesis{,
title = {Ecology and Conservation of Cetaceans in Oman, with particular reference to humpback whales (Megaptera novaeangliae)},
author = {Minton,G.},
year = {2004},
date = {2004-01-01},
number = {407},
pages = {250},
publisher = {University of London, University Marine Biological Station, Millport},
abstract = {Small boat surveys were conducted between 2000 and 2003 in three main areas of Oman's coastal waters: Muscat, the Gulf of Masirah and Dhofar. Species sighted during surveys include (in order of frequency) bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops sp.), common dolphins (Delphinus capensis), humpback whales (Megaptera novaeangliae), spinner dolphins (Stenella longirostris), Indo-Pacific humpback dolphins (Sousa chinensis), Bryde's whales (Balaenoptera brydeii), Risso's dolphins (Grampus griseus), false killer whales (Pseudorca crassidens), blue whales (Balaenoptera musculus) and unidentified beaked whales. Relative abundance analyses with respect to study area, depth and slope reveal clear trends for the seven most frequently encountered species, which generally demonstrate the same habitat preferences as con-specifics elsewhere.
Analyses of humpback whale seasonal distribution, group composition and behaviour reveal that both breeding and feeding take place off the coast of Oman. Photo-identification of individual whales reveals a high level of site fidelity and capture-recapture methods yield population estimates of less than 100 individuals for the study areas, but sample sizes are small and variance values were high. Comparison of the Oman photo-identification catalogue, as well as mitochondrial DNA haplotype frequencies with those from other study areas in the Southern Indian Ocean, support the theory of a resident Arabian Sea population with little or no ongoing exchange with other Indian Ocean stocks.
Rapid population growth, infrastructure development, and expansion of fisheries in Oman are placing increased pressure on coastal and marine habitats. Data from systematic beach surveys indicate relatively high levels of mortality for bottlenose dolphins, Tursiops sp., humpback dolphins, Sousa chinensis, and Bryde's whales, Balaenoptera brydeii. 52% of beach-cast cetacean specimens show signs of fisheries-related mortality, and analysis of humpback whale scarring patterns indicates that approximately a third of all photographed animals bear signs of fisheries interactions. Management and conservation of cetacean species in Oman will require continued research and monitoring, and increased cooperation between governmental bodies and other stakeholders in Oman, including coastal communities, fishers, fishing companies, developers, researchers and tourists as well as government planning bodies.},
keywords = {cetacean, cetaceans, conservation, ecology, Humpback Whale, humpback whales, megaptera novaeangliae, Oman, whale, whales},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {phdthesis}
}
Analyses of humpback whale seasonal distribution, group composition and behaviour reveal that both breeding and feeding take place off the coast of Oman. Photo-identification of individual whales reveals a high level of site fidelity and capture-recapture methods yield population estimates of less than 100 individuals for the study areas, but sample sizes are small and variance values were high. Comparison of the Oman photo-identification catalogue, as well as mitochondrial DNA haplotype frequencies with those from other study areas in the Southern Indian Ocean, support the theory of a resident Arabian Sea population with little or no ongoing exchange with other Indian Ocean stocks.
Rapid population growth, infrastructure development, and expansion of fisheries in Oman are placing increased pressure on coastal and marine habitats. Data from systematic beach surveys indicate relatively high levels of mortality for bottlenose dolphins, Tursiops sp., humpback dolphins, Sousa chinensis, and Bryde's whales, Balaenoptera brydeii. 52% of beach-cast cetacean specimens show signs of fisheries-related mortality, and analysis of humpback whale scarring patterns indicates that approximately a third of all photographed animals bear signs of fisheries interactions. Management and conservation of cetacean species in Oman will require continued research and monitoring, and increased cooperation between governmental bodies and other stakeholders in Oman, including coastal communities, fishers, fishing companies, developers, researchers and tourists as well as government planning bodies.
Minton, Gianna,Collins, Moth.,Findlay, Ken
A note on re-sights of individually identified humpback whales (Megaptera novaeangliae) off the coast of Oman. Doc. SC/55/010 Technical Report
no. 409, 2003.
BibTeX | Tags: Humpback Whale, Oman, photo-ID
@techreport{,
title = {A note on re-sights of individually identified humpback whales (Megaptera novaeangliae) off the coast of Oman. Doc. SC/55/010},
author = {Minton, Gianna,Collins, Moth.,Findlay, Ken},
year = {2003},
date = {2003-01-01},
number = {409},
publisher = {Presented to the Scientific Committee at the 55th Meeting of the International Whaling Commission},
keywords = {Humpback Whale, Oman, photo-ID},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {techreport}
}
IWC
Report of the 54th meeting of the Scientific Committee of the International Whaling Commission, Annex N Report of of the Working Group to Review Sanctuaries and Sanctuary Proposals Technical Report
no. 119, 2002.
BibTeX | Tags: Arabian Sea, Humpback Whale, humpback whales, Indian Ocean, Madagascar, sanctuaries, Stock identity, whale, whaling
@techreport{,
title = {Report of the 54th meeting of the Scientific Committee of the International Whaling Commission, Annex N Report of of the Working Group to Review Sanctuaries and Sanctuary Proposals},
author = {IWC},
year = {2002},
date = {2002-01-01},
number = {119},
publisher = {International Whaling Commission},
keywords = {Arabian Sea, Humpback Whale, humpback whales, Indian Ocean, Madagascar, sanctuaries, Stock identity, whale, whaling},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {techreport}
}