Braulik, G.,Natoli, A.,Kiszka, J,Parra, G.,Plon, S.,Smith, B.D.
Tursiops aduncus Journal Article
In: IUCN Red List of Threatened Species, vol. Downloaded on 20 April 2020, no. 50, 2019.
Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: conservation status, indo-Pacific bottlenose dolphin, IUCN, Red List, tursiops aduncus
@article{,
title = {Tursiops aduncus},
author = {Braulik, G.,Natoli, A.,Kiszka, J,Parra, G.,Plon, S.,Smith, B.D.},
url = {https://www.iucnredlist.org/species/41714/50381127},
doi = {https://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2019-3.RLTS.T41714A50381127.en},
year = {2019},
date = {2019-01-01},
journal = {IUCN Red List of Threatened Species},
volume = {Downloaded on 20 April 2020},
number = {50},
abstract = {Near-threatened: Justification: Indo-Pacific Bottlenose Dolphins generally occur in shallow coastal waters of the Indian Ocean,
Southeast Asia and Australia. They are among the more commonly studied cetaceans in the Indian
Ocean, especially in Shark Bay, Western Australia. However, information on distribution, population size,
and trends in abundance and mortality from much of the species’ range is still very limited. As they are
primarily coastal, Indo-Pacific Bottlenose Dolphins often co-occur with fisheries, and bycatch is a major
cause of concern for this species. Indo-Pacific Bottlenose Dolphins are also at risk from high levels of
noise and chemical pollution, industrial activity such as oil and gas development, and habitat reduction
caused by land reclamation and coastal development (Curry and Smith 1997, Wells and Scott 1999,
Reeves et al. 2003, Kiszka et al. 2008). Furthermore, survey data suggest that Indo-Pacific Bottlenose
Dolphins occur in relatively small populations or communities with limited geographic ranges, especially
where they reside close to islands (Krützen et al. 2004, Natoli et al. 2008, Fury et al. 2008, Särnblad et al.
2011, Kiszka et al. 2012, Gray et al. 2018), which can exacerbate the impact of human activities and
demographic stochasticity on this species. Estimates of abundance from populations for which
information on bycatch is also available indicate that human-caused mortality is frequently
unsustainable (Cockcroft et al. 1992, Shirakihara and Shirakihara 2012, Preen 2004). Based on the sum
of existing abundance estimates, the total population size for the species over its entire range is likely
well in excess of 40,000 individuals. Large parts of the range have never been surveyed (e.g. much of the
Arabian Sea, Arabian/Persian Gulf, Pakistan, India, Red Sea, Somalia, Yemen, Mozambique, Indonesia,
Philippines). The Indo-Pacific Bottlenose Dolphin was classified as Data Deficient in 2008. The species
distribution overlaps the range of several other coastal cetacean species that are red-listed as
Endangered (Irrawaddy Dolphin Orcaella brevirostris and Indian Ocean Humpback Dolphin Sousa
plumbea) or Vulnerable (Indo-Pacific Humpback Dolphin Sousa chinensis and Australian Humpback
Dolphin Sousa sahulensis, Australian Snubfin Dolphin Orcaella heinsohni and the Indo-Pacific Finless
Porpoise Neophocaena phocaenoides) and are subject to the same anthropogenic threats. However,
compared to these other species, the Indo-Pacific Bottlenose Dolphin is assumed to be under less
immediate threat because it has a wider geographic range and probably larger numbers, greater
behavioural plasticity and broader habitat preferences. Data are insufficient to present a robust case for
listing the Indo-Pacific Bottlenose Dolphin in a threatened category (CR, EN, or VU). However, its coastal
distribution, inferred local declines, and intensity of threats throughout its range lead to the conclusion
that Least Concern is not an appropriate category. The Red List Guidelines (version 11, 2014) state that
“the category Near Threatened is applied to taxa that do not qualify as threatened now, but may be
close to qualifying as threatened, and to taxa that do not currently meet the criteria for a threatened
category, but are likely to do so if ongoing conservation actions abate or cease.” Also, to qualify for Near
Threatened, the taxon “should be close to qualifying for the Vulnerable category; estimates of
population size or habitat should be close to the Vulnerable thresholds, especially when there is a high
degree of uncertainty, or possibly meet some of the subcriteria; and this may be combined with
biological susceptibility and threat.” Considering the above, the Indo-Pacific Bottlenose Dolphin is listed
as Near Threatened because: 1) it occurs in a relatively small and restricted near-shore range, 2) it is
highly vulnerable to entanglement in fishing gear and its range overlaps with intensive fisheries known
to entangle and kill dolphins, 3) its near-shore habitat is subject to increasing anthropogenic threats
resulting in habitat loss and degradation, and 4) it is experiencing mortality rates that are likely to be
causing population declines in several areas. The species therefore comes close to meeting criterion A4
for Vulnerable. Population size is inferred and suspected to have declined by close to 30% throughout
the range of the species, over three generations and in a time period encompassing the past, present
and future. The causes of the reduction (gillnet entanglement and coastal habitat degradation) have not
ceased. Generation length for Indo-Pacific Bottlenose Dolphins, according to Taylor et al. (2007), is 21.1
years, therefore three generations is 63.3 years. Thus, an annual decline of around 0.5% would result in
exceeding the 30% decline in 3 generations. Gillnet fisheries and coastal development are increasing
throughout the range of the species and bycatch is anticipated to remain stable or to increase in the
future without urgent and intensive efforts which are unlikely to be forthcoming. It is important to
emphasize that numerous isolated populations of this species would likely qualify as threatened
subpopulations, particularly those found around island groups in the Indian Ocean.},
keywords = {conservation status, indo-Pacific bottlenose dolphin, IUCN, Red List, tursiops aduncus},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Near-threatened: Justification: Indo-Pacific Bottlenose Dolphins generally occur in shallow coastal waters of the Indian Ocean,
Southeast Asia and Australia. They are among the more commonly studied cetaceans in the Indian
Ocean, especially in Shark Bay, Western Australia. However, information on distribution, population size,
and trends in abundance and mortality from much of the species’ range is still very limited. As they are
primarily coastal, Indo-Pacific Bottlenose Dolphins often co-occur with fisheries, and bycatch is a major
cause of concern for this species. Indo-Pacific Bottlenose Dolphins are also at risk from high levels of
noise and chemical pollution, industrial activity such as oil and gas development, and habitat reduction
caused by land reclamation and coastal development (Curry and Smith 1997, Wells and Scott 1999,
Reeves et al. 2003, Kiszka et al. 2008). Furthermore, survey data suggest that Indo-Pacific Bottlenose
Dolphins occur in relatively small populations or communities with limited geographic ranges, especially
where they reside close to islands (Krützen et al. 2004, Natoli et al. 2008, Fury et al. 2008, Särnblad et al.
2011, Kiszka et al. 2012, Gray et al. 2018), which can exacerbate the impact of human activities and
demographic stochasticity on this species. Estimates of abundance from populations for which
information on bycatch is also available indicate that human-caused mortality is frequently
unsustainable (Cockcroft et al. 1992, Shirakihara and Shirakihara 2012, Preen 2004). Based on the sum
of existing abundance estimates, the total population size for the species over its entire range is likely
well in excess of 40,000 individuals. Large parts of the range have never been surveyed (e.g. much of the
Arabian Sea, Arabian/Persian Gulf, Pakistan, India, Red Sea, Somalia, Yemen, Mozambique, Indonesia,
Philippines). The Indo-Pacific Bottlenose Dolphin was classified as Data Deficient in 2008. The species
distribution overlaps the range of several other coastal cetacean species that are red-listed as
Endangered (Irrawaddy Dolphin Orcaella brevirostris and Indian Ocean Humpback Dolphin Sousa
plumbea) or Vulnerable (Indo-Pacific Humpback Dolphin Sousa chinensis and Australian Humpback
Dolphin Sousa sahulensis, Australian Snubfin Dolphin Orcaella heinsohni and the Indo-Pacific Finless
Porpoise Neophocaena phocaenoides) and are subject to the same anthropogenic threats. However,
compared to these other species, the Indo-Pacific Bottlenose Dolphin is assumed to be under less
immediate threat because it has a wider geographic range and probably larger numbers, greater
behavioural plasticity and broader habitat preferences. Data are insufficient to present a robust case for
listing the Indo-Pacific Bottlenose Dolphin in a threatened category (CR, EN, or VU). However, its coastal
distribution, inferred local declines, and intensity of threats throughout its range lead to the conclusion
that Least Concern is not an appropriate category. The Red List Guidelines (version 11, 2014) state that
“the category Near Threatened is applied to taxa that do not qualify as threatened now, but may be
close to qualifying as threatened, and to taxa that do not currently meet the criteria for a threatened
category, but are likely to do so if ongoing conservation actions abate or cease.” Also, to qualify for Near
Threatened, the taxon “should be close to qualifying for the Vulnerable category; estimates of
population size or habitat should be close to the Vulnerable thresholds, especially when there is a high
degree of uncertainty, or possibly meet some of the subcriteria; and this may be combined with
biological susceptibility and threat.” Considering the above, the Indo-Pacific Bottlenose Dolphin is listed
as Near Threatened because: 1) it occurs in a relatively small and restricted near-shore range, 2) it is
highly vulnerable to entanglement in fishing gear and its range overlaps with intensive fisheries known
to entangle and kill dolphins, 3) its near-shore habitat is subject to increasing anthropogenic threats
resulting in habitat loss and degradation, and 4) it is experiencing mortality rates that are likely to be
causing population declines in several areas. The species therefore comes close to meeting criterion A4
for Vulnerable. Population size is inferred and suspected to have declined by close to 30% throughout
the range of the species, over three generations and in a time period encompassing the past, present
and future. The causes of the reduction (gillnet entanglement and coastal habitat degradation) have not
ceased. Generation length for Indo-Pacific Bottlenose Dolphins, according to Taylor et al. (2007), is 21.1
years, therefore three generations is 63.3 years. Thus, an annual decline of around 0.5% would result in
exceeding the 30% decline in 3 generations. Gillnet fisheries and coastal development are increasing
throughout the range of the species and bycatch is anticipated to remain stable or to increase in the
future without urgent and intensive efforts which are unlikely to be forthcoming. It is important to
emphasize that numerous isolated populations of this species would likely qualify as threatened
subpopulations, particularly those found around island groups in the Indian Ocean.
Southeast Asia and Australia. They are among the more commonly studied cetaceans in the Indian
Ocean, especially in Shark Bay, Western Australia. However, information on distribution, population size,
and trends in abundance and mortality from much of the species’ range is still very limited. As they are
primarily coastal, Indo-Pacific Bottlenose Dolphins often co-occur with fisheries, and bycatch is a major
cause of concern for this species. Indo-Pacific Bottlenose Dolphins are also at risk from high levels of
noise and chemical pollution, industrial activity such as oil and gas development, and habitat reduction
caused by land reclamation and coastal development (Curry and Smith 1997, Wells and Scott 1999,
Reeves et al. 2003, Kiszka et al. 2008). Furthermore, survey data suggest that Indo-Pacific Bottlenose
Dolphins occur in relatively small populations or communities with limited geographic ranges, especially
where they reside close to islands (Krützen et al. 2004, Natoli et al. 2008, Fury et al. 2008, Särnblad et al.
2011, Kiszka et al. 2012, Gray et al. 2018), which can exacerbate the impact of human activities and
demographic stochasticity on this species. Estimates of abundance from populations for which
information on bycatch is also available indicate that human-caused mortality is frequently
unsustainable (Cockcroft et al. 1992, Shirakihara and Shirakihara 2012, Preen 2004). Based on the sum
of existing abundance estimates, the total population size for the species over its entire range is likely
well in excess of 40,000 individuals. Large parts of the range have never been surveyed (e.g. much of the
Arabian Sea, Arabian/Persian Gulf, Pakistan, India, Red Sea, Somalia, Yemen, Mozambique, Indonesia,
Philippines). The Indo-Pacific Bottlenose Dolphin was classified as Data Deficient in 2008. The species
distribution overlaps the range of several other coastal cetacean species that are red-listed as
Endangered (Irrawaddy Dolphin Orcaella brevirostris and Indian Ocean Humpback Dolphin Sousa
plumbea) or Vulnerable (Indo-Pacific Humpback Dolphin Sousa chinensis and Australian Humpback
Dolphin Sousa sahulensis, Australian Snubfin Dolphin Orcaella heinsohni and the Indo-Pacific Finless
Porpoise Neophocaena phocaenoides) and are subject to the same anthropogenic threats. However,
compared to these other species, the Indo-Pacific Bottlenose Dolphin is assumed to be under less
immediate threat because it has a wider geographic range and probably larger numbers, greater
behavioural plasticity and broader habitat preferences. Data are insufficient to present a robust case for
listing the Indo-Pacific Bottlenose Dolphin in a threatened category (CR, EN, or VU). However, its coastal
distribution, inferred local declines, and intensity of threats throughout its range lead to the conclusion
that Least Concern is not an appropriate category. The Red List Guidelines (version 11, 2014) state that
“the category Near Threatened is applied to taxa that do not qualify as threatened now, but may be
close to qualifying as threatened, and to taxa that do not currently meet the criteria for a threatened
category, but are likely to do so if ongoing conservation actions abate or cease.” Also, to qualify for Near
Threatened, the taxon “should be close to qualifying for the Vulnerable category; estimates of
population size or habitat should be close to the Vulnerable thresholds, especially when there is a high
degree of uncertainty, or possibly meet some of the subcriteria; and this may be combined with
biological susceptibility and threat.” Considering the above, the Indo-Pacific Bottlenose Dolphin is listed
as Near Threatened because: 1) it occurs in a relatively small and restricted near-shore range, 2) it is
highly vulnerable to entanglement in fishing gear and its range overlaps with intensive fisheries known
to entangle and kill dolphins, 3) its near-shore habitat is subject to increasing anthropogenic threats
resulting in habitat loss and degradation, and 4) it is experiencing mortality rates that are likely to be
causing population declines in several areas. The species therefore comes close to meeting criterion A4
for Vulnerable. Population size is inferred and suspected to have declined by close to 30% throughout
the range of the species, over three generations and in a time period encompassing the past, present
and future. The causes of the reduction (gillnet entanglement and coastal habitat degradation) have not
ceased. Generation length for Indo-Pacific Bottlenose Dolphins, according to Taylor et al. (2007), is 21.1
years, therefore three generations is 63.3 years. Thus, an annual decline of around 0.5% would result in
exceeding the 30% decline in 3 generations. Gillnet fisheries and coastal development are increasing
throughout the range of the species and bycatch is anticipated to remain stable or to increase in the
future without urgent and intensive efforts which are unlikely to be forthcoming. It is important to
emphasize that numerous isolated populations of this species would likely qualify as threatened
subpopulations, particularly those found around island groups in the Indian Ocean.